MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893444699 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15723411

Extent of Compliance of Alternative Delivery Modes in Senior High School: Basis for an Intervention Plan

2025· dissertation· en· W6893444699 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicE-Learning and COVID-19
Canadian institutionsNOSM University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)Nonprobability samplingCompliance (psychology)Plan (archaeology)Intervention (counseling)Work (physics)The Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to maintain learning continuity during extended school disruptions, the Philippine educational system had to make the transition to Alternative Delivery Modes (ADM). The purpose of this study was to assess the level of ADM implementation and compliance in senior high schools in the Camalaniugan District during the 2024–2025 academic year. The study included document analysis, interviews, and survey questionnaires as part of a descriptive-correlational research design. Teachers chosen through purposive sampling were among the respondents. To ascertain the associations between variables, quantitative data were evaluated using weighted mean, frequency, percentage, and Pearson's r. The results showed that although ADM standards were somewhat met, problems remained in areas including poor internet access, delayed module creation and delivery, more work for teachers, and little parental assistance. In spite of this, schools showed flexibility by creating community learning centers and fortifying their relationships with regional partners. The effectiveness of implementation and adherence to ADM standards were found to be significantly positively correlated. The study comes to the conclusion that localized innovations and ongoing institutional support are essential for enhancing the delivery of ADM. It is suggested that DepEd strengthen ADM-specific teacher preparation and resource mobilization, as well as institutionalize barangay-based learning support centers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicE-Learning and COVID-19French-language works237,207