MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893459246 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.2658682

OUT OF POCKET EXPENDITURES FOR MANAGING CHILDHOOD ACUTE RESPIRATORY INFECTION IN CHILDREN UNDER 5 IN DISTRICT KASUR PUNJAB

2019· article· en· W6893459246 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPediatric health and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRespiratory infectionPublic healthQuarter (Canadian coin)Developing countryChild healthHealth careRespiratory tract infectionsRural areaUnder-fiveChild mortality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Acute respiratory infections are major public health threats in children aged less than 5 years. Acute respiratory infections caused 20%of the childhood deaths worldwide in which 99% deaths in children under 5 are reported in developing countries like Pakistan. Globally, about 150 million people were affected with financial loss after out of pocket expenditure on health. Out of pocket costs accounts for 61% of the health care financing in Pakistan The mortality rates in rural areas in children under 5 are about a quarter to a third higher in comparison to urban areas. Methodology: Simple random sampling technique was used. Data was collected only on those children under 5 who met the case definition for acute respiratory infection. The main objective of the study was to estimate the cost per episode of acute respiratory infection in children under 5 years. A structured questionnaire was used for data collection. The calculated sample size was 229 Main findings: The median cost per episode of ARI on child treatment was approximately US$3 (300 PKR). The median of direct medical cost of ARI US$ 1.5(150PKR) was higher as compared to non-medical costs US$1.0(100 PKR).Almost every outpatient visit either in private or public hospital resulted in costs for prescribed medication but no laboratory tests were recommended.. Conclusion Study participants spend more on their male child as compared to female child. Families with higher income have more health expenditures on their child treatment than those having less income. The majority of the parents (75%) preferred to visit private health care providers for the treatment of their children. Estimated indirect cost was higher in public facilities as compared to private facilities because of waiting time to consult the doctor was longer. Keywords: Out of pocket expenditure, acute respiratory infections, costs, Direct, Indirect, Public, and Private.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPediatric health and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207