Allocapnia illinoensis Frison 1935
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Allocapnia illinoensis Frison, 1935 Notes This species is commonly known as the Illinois Snowfly (Stark et al. 2012). Isolated populations of this rare species have been reported mainly from eastern Canada, south to Virginia, and west to Illinois (Ross and Ricker 1971, DeWalt et al. 2024). Ross et al. (1967) discussed the post-glacial colonization of this species into eastern Canada. Ross and Ricker (1971) provided a distributional map of this species that included three localities in eastern New York State (their fig. 97) yet without precise locality information. Myers et al. (2011) provided the most recent reports of this species from a first order low gradient stream with a substrate composed primarily of sand and cobble, with moss covering some of the larger in-stream substrates. Harper and Harper (1983) reported that A. illinoensis “ dominate ” in small streams of southern Quebec. Webb (2002) presented evidence that this species has been extirpated from Illinois. In New York, adults of this species have been collected from early March through early April (Fig. 7) but infrequently from streams and rivers of moderate elevation 392-427 m asl (Fig. 9). This species is known from four unique locations in Level IV Ecoregions Eastern Adirondack Foothills (58 ac), Central Adirondacks (58 ad), Glaciated Low Allegheny Plateau (60 a), and Mohawk Valley (83 f) (Fig. 10 d).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".