Bibliographic record
Abstract
Catocalini 1705 R Catocala relicta Walker, 1858 E Aug – L Sep M B G T: Barnes and McDunnough (1918a), Forbes (1954) L: Bowman (1951), Crumb (1956), Prentice (1962), Pohl et al. (2004b) C: CNC, NFRC, OLDS, PMAE, UASM 1706 R Catocala unijuga Walker, 1858 E Jul – L Sep M B g T: Barnes and McDunnough (1918a), Forbes (1954) L: Bowman (1951), Crumb (1956), Pohl et al. (2004b) C: CNC, NFRC, OLDS, PMAE, UASM 1707 R Catocala parta Guenée, 1852 L Jul – E Sep – – G T: Barnes and McDunnough (1918a), Forbes (1954) L: Bowman (1951) C: CNC, UASM 1708 R Catocala luciana Strecker, 1874 M Aug – E Oct – – G T: Barnes and McDunnough (1918a), Forbes (1954) L: Bowman (1951), Hooper (1990a) C: CNC, UASM 1709 * R Catocala hermia Edwards, 1880 L Jul – E Sep – – G T: Barnes and McDunnough (1918a) L: Bowman (1951) C: CNC, OLDS, PMAE, UASM 1710 * R Catocala californica Edwards, 1864 L Aug M – – T: Barnes and McDunnough (1918a) L: None C: UASM 1711 R Catocala briseis Edwards, 1864 L Jul – L Sep M B G T: Barnes and McDunnough (1918a), Forbes (1954) L: Bowman (1951), Prentice (1962), Pohl et al. (2004b) C: CNC, NFRC, OLDS, PMAE, UASM 1712 * R Catocala grotiana Bailey, 1879 E Sep M – – T: Barnes and McDunnough (1918a) L: none C: UASM 1713 * R Catocala semirelicta Grote, 1874 M Jul – L Sep M B G T: Barnes and McDunnough (1918a), Forbes (1954) L: Bowman (1951), Pohl et al. (2004b) C: CNC, NFRC, OLDS, PMAE, UASM 1714 * R Catocala meskei Grote, 1873 L Jul – M Sep – – G T: Barnes and McDunnough (1918a), Forbes (1954) L: Bowman (1951) C: CNC, UASM 1715 R Catocala junctura Walker, 1858 L Aug – E Sep – – G T: Barnes and McDunnough (1918a), Forbes (1954) L: None C: CNC, UASM 1716 R Catocala concumbens Walker, 1858 M Aug – b G T: Barnes and McDunnough (1918a), Forbes (1954) L: Bowman (1951) C: CNC, UASM 1716.1 * P Catocala sordida Grote, 1877? – B – T: Barnes and McDunnough (1918a), Forbes (1954) 1717 R Catocala ultronia (Hübner, 1823) E Aug – M Aug – – G T: Barnes and McDunnough (1918), Forbes (1954) L: None C: CNC, UASM 1718 * R Catocala praeclara Grote and Robinson, 1866 E Sep – – G T: Barnes and McDunnough (1918a), Forbes (1954) L: None C: CNC, UASM 1719 R Catocala blandula Hulst, 1884 E Jul – L Sep m B G T: Barnes and McDunnough (1918a), Forbes (1954) L: Bowman (1951) C: CNC, OLDS, PMAE, UASM
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.052 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".