Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Lasioglossum clematisellum species complex Species included Lasioglossum clastipedion sp. nov., L. clavicorne sp. nov., L. clematisellum, L. julipile sp. nov., and L. perditum sp. nov. Diagnosis The Lasioglossum clematisellum species complex comprises several morphologically and genetically similar species found in deserts of the southwestern United States and northern Mexico. Females can be fairly easily diagnosed by the combination of wings pale with extremely short, inconspicuous white hairs, metapostnotal rugae strong and usually reaching the posterior margin, punctures of the face, hypoepimeron, and mesepisternum all distinctly separated, and T2 without dark spiracular spots. Males are small (<5 mm), with the metasoma relatively narrow and all black to brown, rims of T1–3 largely impunctate, flagellomeres relatively long (F2–11 1.5–2 times as long as broad), head and mesosoma usually shiny with distinctly separated punctures, and metapostnotum usually with strong rugae reaching the posterior margin and extending onto the dorsolateral slope. In addition, males of this group often lack the second submarginal crossvein in one or both forewings, therefore possessing only two submarginal cells, and in one species (L. perditum sp. nov.) this is the usual condition. The male of L. clavicorne sp. nov. is unusual and lacks many of these diagnostic characters; L. clavicorne sp. nov. is included in this group mainly based on female morphology. These species are usually challenging to distinguish morphologically, but most are limited geographically and so collection locality may be used as an aid to identification. Lasioglossum clematisellum is the only species in this group with a very large distribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".