Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Cybaeus L. Koch 1868 Amaurobius (in part) C.L. Koch 1839: 43, fig. 462. Cybaeus L. Koch 1868: 46, figs 22–25. Chamberlin & Ivie 1932: 3; Roewer 1954: 88; Bonnet 1956: 1299; Roth & Brame 1972: 19, figs 6, 10, 20, 27–28; Brignoli 1983: 484; Roth & Brown 1986: 3, 12; Platnick 1989: 406; Copley et al. 2009: 372, figs 1–113; Bennett et al. 2016: 5, figs 1–189; Bennett et al. 2019, figs 1–71; World Spider Catalog 2020. Parauximus Chamberlin 1919: 2, plate I, fig. 2. Namopsilus Chamberlin 1919: 14, plate VI, fig. 1. Type species. Amaurobius tetricus C.L. Koch 1839. Note. See Copley et al. (2009) for genus diagnosis and descriptive details as well as a key to the species groups (females only) of the Holarctic and Californian clades of Cybaeus. See Bennett et al. (2016, 2019) for, respectively, revisions of the Nearctic species of the Holarctic clade and of the adenes group of the Californian clade of Cybaeus. Bennett (2005, 2017) provided keys to all Nearctic genera then classified in Cybaeidae. Males of Cybaeus species often are difficult to assign to particular species groups. When in doubt about the group affiliation of male specimens, explore the keys to the species in the tetricus and angustiarum groups of the Holarctic clade (Bennett et al. 2016) and the key to species in the adenes group of the Californian clade (Bennett et al. 2019) or consider one of the four other Californian clade species groups (consocius, devius, septatus, and tardatus groups) discussed by Bennett (1991) and Copley et. al. (2009).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".