Cryptophagus difficilis Casey 1900
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<i>Cryptophagus difficilis</i> Casey, 1900 <b>LABRADOR:</b> Goose Bay, military base, July 28-August 6, 2008, G.R. Pohl & D.W. Langor, weedy <i>Salix</i> /grass clearing, pitfall (1, MUN); Middle Brook, June 2–17, 2005, July 4–18, 2005, July 18–2, August 2–11, 2005, August, 2005, August 11–24, 2005, August 24-September 12, 2005, S. Pardy, boreal forest, pitfall (73, MUN); Muskrat Falls, June 2–17, 2005, June 17-July 5, 2005, July 5–19, 2005, July 19-August 3, 2005, August 3–12, 2005, August 12–25, 2005, August 25-September 13, 2005, S. Pardy, boreal forest, pitfall (215, MUN); Muskrat Falls, July 31, 2008, G.R. Pohl & D.W. Langor, wooded trails, ex mushrooms (3, MUN); Ossak Camp, August 11– 29, 2004, September 22-October 8, 2004, September 27-October 8, 2004, S. Pardy, subarctic black spruce forest, pitfall (7, MUN); Port Hope, July 22-August 5, 2004, August 5–25, 2004, August 25-September 13, 2005, S. Pardy, subarctic black spruce forest, pitfall (22, MUN); St. Lewis, July 5–22, 2004, August 10–25, 2004, August 25-September 7, 2004, S. Pardy, coastal barrens, heath, pitfall (16, MUN). <b>NEW- FOUNDLAND:</b> Baker’s Brook, Gros Morne National Park, July-August, 2000, N. Chalk (7, MUN); Burnt Cape, July 24–7 August, 2003, August 7–21, 2003, A.M. Hynes, cow parsnip patch, pitfall (2, MUN); Burnt Cape, July 24–7 August, 2003, A.M. Hynes, shoreline, pitfall (1, MUN); Gambo, August 26, 1949, E. Palmen (6, MZHF); Glide Lake, August 30, 1994, W. Bowers (1, CFS); St. John Island, August 3, 1949, C.H. Lindroth (1, MZHF); St. John’s, September-November, 1994, Biology 4150 (3, MUN); St. John’s, September 30, 1997, J. Coombes (1, AAFC); Windsor Lake, August 30, 1977, D. Larson (5, MUN). <i>Cryptophagus difficilis</i> is newly recorded in insular Newfoundland, Labrador and in Atlantic Canada (Figs. 3, 6). In Canada, previous records of the species are from British Columbia, Alberta, the Yukon, and Québec; in the United States it has been found from Idaho to New Jersey, and south to Georgia (Woodroffe and Coombs 1961). In British Columbia it has been collected from fungus (Woodroffe and Coombs 1961). It is a flightless species, and in most of the specimens examined from this region, the wings were vestigial (although one specimen had reduced wings equal to approximately half the length of the abdomen).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".