Cybaeus aspenicolens Chamberlin & Ivie 1932
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key to the species of the Cybaeus aspenicolens group 1. Patellar apophysis broad, blunt; peg setae dimorphic, in two groups (Figs 2, 5, 8, 11–13). Proximal arm of tegular apophysis “C”-shaped, tip strongly retrolaterally directed, uncinate (Figs 3–4, 6–7, 9–10). Atrium in a prominent epigynal concavity; atrial openings not obscured by anterior transverse epigynal ridge or hood (Figs 14, 16, 18) (aspenicolens subgroup)...... 2 - Patellar apophysis narrower, tapered; peg setae monomorphic, in single group (Figs 25, 29). Proximal arm of tegular apophysis relatively straight, not “C”-shaped, tip prolaterally directed, bifurcate (especially in retrolateral view) (Figs 26, 28, 30–33). Prominent epigynal concavity lacking; atrial openings at least partially obscured by anterior transverse ridge or hood (Figs 34–35, 38–39) (fraxineus subgroup)...................................................................... 4 2(1). Proximal arm of tegular apophysis strongly deflected dorsally, mostly hidden in ventral view (Fig. 9) and visible only in posterior view (Fig. 10). Patellar apophysis with about 30 or 40 conspicuous stout peg setae retrolaterally and approximately two dozen much smaller peg setae dorsally (Figs 8, 13). Anterior transverse ridge bordering epigynal depression absent or only weakly developed (Fig. 14). No distinct sclerotized regions on epigynum..................... coylei Bennett spec. nov. - Proximal arm of tegular apophysis only slightly deflected dorsally and clearly visible in ventral view (Figs 3, 6). Patellar apophysis with ± two dozen conspicuous peg setae retrolaterally and ±15 small peg setae dorsally (Figs 2, 5, 11, 12). Anterior transverse epigynal ridge prominent (Figs 16, 18). Some degree of sclerotization on epigynum....................... 3 3(2). Patellar apophysis with about two dozen retrolateral peg setae and less than ten (usually four to seven) very small dorsal peg setae in a loose cluster (Figs 2, 11). Tip of proximal arm of tegular apophysis very slightly twisted (Figs 3–4). Atrial openings covered by pair of longitudinal flaps (Fig. 16). Vulval ducts often broadly contiguous along vulval midline (Figs 17, 21).............................................................................. aspenicolens Chamberlin & Ivie - Fifteen to 20 retrolateral peg setae and usually 12 to 15 short, stout dorsal peg setae in a tight cluster (Figs 5, 12). Tip of proximal arm of tegular apophysis strongly twisted (Figs 6–7). Atrial openings usually not covered (Fig. 18). Vulval ducts usually not contiguous (Figs 19, 23–24).................................................... blasbes Chamberlin & Ivie 4(1). In ventral view, proximal arm of tegular apophysis distinctly bifurcate, ventral tip of proximal arm prominent with broad rounded surface, dorsal tip angular (Figs 26–27, 32). Vulval ducts contiguous medially from atrium to spermathecal stalks (Figs 35–37)....................................................................... fraxineus Bennett spec. nov. - In ventral view, proximal arm of tegular apophysis not distinctly bifurcate, with an inconspicuous narrow keel ventrally and a smoothly pointed tip dorsally (Figs 30, 33). Vulval ducts contiguous only along posterior portion of copulatory ducts (Figs 39–40)............................................................................ thermydrinos Bennett
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".