Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key to species of Philetus (males) 1 Terminalia with cercus bifid apically; hypandrium without apical rods; postgonite projected dorsally as broad U-shaped lobe (Cumming et al. 2016, figs 17–20). Antenna with postpedicel broadly produced apically (Cumming et al. 2016, fig. 8)..................................................................................... P. schizophorus Melander - Terminalia with cercus simple, elongate, not bifid apically (Figs 3, 5); hypandrium with hooked-shaped apical rods (Fig. 4); postgonite projected dorsally as wide rounded lobe (Fig. 4). Antenna with postpedicel narrowly produced apically (Cumming et al. 2016, fig. 7)..................................................................................... 2 2 Terminalia with cercus rounded apically, without pronounced apical ventral hook (Fig. 3); ventral subepandrial lobe with digitiform apex and thumb-like preapical medially-directed process (Fig. 5); medial subepandrial lobe absent; epandrial lobe with posteriorly hooked dorsal process (Figs 3, 5); hypandrium with narrow median apical process (Figs 3, 4)..... P. kitsi sp. nov. - Terminalia with cercus bearing pronounced apical ventral hook; ventral subepandrial lobe with broadly deflexed apex, lacking preapical medially-directed process; medial subepandrial lobe present; epandrial lobe with bifid dorsal process; hypandrium with thick median apical process (Cumming et al. 2016, figs 13–16).......................... P. memorandus Melander
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.102 | 0.043 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".