MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6893727077 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5054243

Munidopsis curvirostra Whiteaves 1874

2005· article· en· W6893727077 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarapaceLife historyReproduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Munidopsis curvirostra Whiteaves, 1874 Munidopsis curvirostra Whiteaves, 1874: 212.—Udekem d’Acoz, 1999: 167 (list of occurrences).— Baba, 2005: 287 (list of occurrences and references). Material examined. Bay of Biscay, BIOGAS 1, Stn CM01, 47º44.3’N, 08º51W, 1010 m, 04.08.1972: 1 male 6.0 mm, 1 female 4.6 mm.— Stn CW 3, 47º31’N, 08º17’W, 1100 m, 05.08.1972: 2 ovig. females 8.0– 10.4 mm. Off Ireland, INCAL, Stn DS 01, 57°59.2’N, 10°41.3’W, 2091 m, 15.07.1976: 1 male 4.5 mm, 2 females 3.3 mm, 3 juveniles 2.6–3.0 mm.— Stn DS 02, 57°58.5’N, 10°49.2’W, 2081 m, 16.07.1976: 1 female 3.0 mm. NE Tropical Atlantic, EUMELI 2, Stn CP 03, 20º41.30’N, 18º32.60’W, 2114 m, 05.02.1991: 12 males 7.1–9.8 mm, 16 ovig. females 7.0– 11.2 mm, 3 females 6.5–6.9 mm.— Stn CP 04, 20º33’N, 18º35’W, 2003 m, 06.02.1991: 17 males 4.7–8.4 mm, 9 ovig. females 8.0– 11.1 mm, 3 females 5.7–5.8 mm, 3 juv. 2.2–2.4 mm.— Stn CP 05, 20º30.51’N, 18º33.74’W, 1855 m, 06.02.1991: 11 males 4.6–9.0 mm, 9 ovig. females 7.2–9.5 mm, 2 juv. 3.6–3.7 mm. NE Tropical Atlantic, EUMELI 4, Stn CP 16, 20º32’N, 18º36’W, 2042 m, 05.06.1992: 8 males 5.4–11.0 mm, 13 ovig. females 7.1–12.7 mm, 2 females 7.4–8.1 mm. NE Atlantic, PROSPEC, Stn CPH 06, 56º39.970’N, 09º45.378’W, 1734 m, 08.07.1996: 5 males 8.0– 11.8 mm, 4 ovig. females 9.9–10.5 mm.— Stn CPH 07, 56º41.710’N, 09º36.924’W, 1607 m, 08.07.1996: 6 males 8.3–10.3 mm.— Stn CPH 10, 55º18.687’N, 10º14.833’W, 1589 m, 12.07.1996: 1 ovig. female 8.5 mm. Remarks. Munidopsis curvirostra belongs to the group of species with the carapace lateral margin with an anterolateral spine only, two epigastric spines and a row of spines in the dorsal midline, the rostrum spiniform being more than two­thirds as long as the remainder of the carapace and strongly upcurved, the front margin without antennal spine, abdominal segments 2 and3 with median spine, segment 4 unarmed; the cornea oval, about half or slightly more than half the length of the ocular peduncle, the eye­spine absent, the first walking leg not reaching end of the cheliped, the merus of the cheliped lacking spines, other than distal spines, the meri of the walking legs relatively slender, not keeled dorsally, and epipods absent from pereiopods. The species is very close to M. acuta (A. Milne Edwards, 1881) from the Bay of Biscay, and M. longirostris (A. Milne Edwards & Bouvier, 1897) from Morocco, respectively. These two species are considered to be junior synonyms of M. curvirostra (Hansen 1908, see A. Milne Edwards 1883, edition of 1997). However, a complete revision of the type material of these species would be desirable in order to confirm the existence of one or several taxa (Udeken d’Acoz 1999). Distribution. Northwest Atlantic, Gulf of St Lawrence, 146–403 m (type locality, Whiteaves 1874, see also Smith 1886, Squires 1990), Davis Straits, Iceland, 349–975 m (Hansen 1908), Ireland, 1797 m (Selbie 1914), S of Greenland (Heegaard 1941), southeast of Newfoundland, 1100 m (Sivertsen & Holthuis 1956), Portugal and Morocco, 1716–1912 m (Türkay 1976), Middle Atlantic Bight, 636–2200 m (Wenner 1982), Bay of Biscay, 1845–2430 m (de Saint Laurent 1985); British Isles (Moyse & Smaldon 1990), Morocco (Garcia­Raso 1996). The species has been also cited at the Lord Howe Ridge, southwest Pacific, at 1210 m (Khodkina 1981). The present material has been collected in the northeast Atlantic, from Ireland (57º59’N) to Mauritania (20º30’N), between 1010 and 2114 m.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMarine and coastal plant biology→French-language works237,207→