Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key to <i>Alaptus</i> group of genera. Females. 1 Tarsi 3- or 4-segmented; funicle 4- or 5-segmented; clava 2-segmented; mandible with 4 teeth................................................................................ <i>Kikiki</i> – Tarsi 5-segmented; funicle at least 5-segmented; clava 1-segmented; mandible with 2 teeth........................................................................................... <b>2</b> 2(1) Funicle 5-segmented or rarely with a minute additional segment; fore wing hind margin with a distinct, often recurved, notch behind venation and thereafter almost straight to apex...................................................... <i>Alaptus</i> – Funicle usually with 6 or 7 distinct segments (Figs 5, 9, 11, 16) but one Australian species of <i>Dicopus</i> with 5 segments; fore wing without a distinct notch on hind margin except one species of <i>Dicopomorpha</i> from New Zealand (Noyes and Valentine 1989) and hind margin either concave along much of length or only distally................................................................................. <b>3</b> 3(2) Head in anterior view with mandibles projecting ventrally, not crossed when closed (Figs 13, 15); mandible with one long and one short tooth; fore wing extremely narrow (Figs 12, 19)......................................................... <i>Dicopus</i> – Head in anterior view with mandibles crossed medially when closed (Figs 4, 9); mandible with two subequal teeth; fore wing wider (Figs 1, 6, 10)........ <b>4</b> 4(3) Posterior scutellum entire (Figs 3, 14)................................... <i>Dicopomorpha</i> – Posterior scutellum divided medially by a longitudinal suture (Fig. 8)............................................................................................................ <i>Mimalaptus</i>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.080 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".