Bibliographic record
Abstract
Subfamily * Aphalaroidinae Vondráček, 1963 Arepuniinae White & Hodkinson, 1985: 271 (misspelling). Comments The monophyly of Aphalaroidinae as understood here is strongly supported in both mtg trees and it is well circumscribed morphologically (Burckhardt 1987). The molecular analyses place Telmapsylla, which was previously included in the Aphalaroidinae (Burckhardt & Ouvrard 2012), in Ciriacreminae; we therefore transfer this genus to Ciriacreminae. Burckhardt & Ouvrard (2012) treated Primascena † as a synonym of Diclidophlebia (Liviidae: Liviinae). However, the presence of metabasitarsal spurs and a crown of spaced apical spurs on the metatibia in P. subita † Klimaszewski, 1998, the type species of Primascena †, indicate a relationship to Aphalaroidinae, as suggested by Burckhardt & Mifsud (2003). We follow the latter authors and recognise Primascena †, stat. rev., as a valid genus in the Aphalaroidinae. The internal phylogenetic relationships were discussed by Burckhardt (1987, 2005) but there is no explicit, testable hypothesis. In the molecular analyses, where only three of the 13 currently recognised genera were included, the sister group relationship between Aphalaroida and Russelliana is only poorly supported. Included genera * Aphalaroida Crawford, 1914; Baccharopelma Burckhardt et al., 2004 (replacement name for Neopelma Burckhardt nec Sclater, Burckhardtia Straube & Meritzki nec Frech, nec Brown & Hodkinson); Connectopelma Šulc, 1914 (replacement name for Delina Blanchard nec Robineau-Desvoidy); Ehrendorferiana Burckhardt, 2005; * Freysuila Aleman, 1887 (syn. Indana); Pachyparia Loginova, 1967; Panisopelma Enderlein, 1910; Primascena † Klimaszewski, 1998, stat. rev.; Prosopidopsylla Burckhardt, 1987; * Russelliana Tuthill, 1959 (syn. Arepuna); Sphinia Blanchard, 1852; Yangus Fang, 1990 (syn. Pallipsylla); Zonopelma Burckhardt, 1987.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".