Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paraleuctra occidentalis (Banks) Leuctra occidentalis Banks, 1907:329. Lectotype ♀ (Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University), Laggan, Alberta, designated by Ricker, 1952 Leuctra bradleyi Needham & Claassen, 1925:225. Holotype ♂, damaged (Cornell University), Emerald Lake, Canadian Rockies Material examined. Canada: Emerald Lake, Canadian Rockies, P. bradleyi holotype, abdomen lost (Cornell University). Alberta, Laggan, 22 July 1901, R. Osburn, lectotype ♀ (Museum of Comparative Zoology). Same location, 23 August 1902, R. Osburn, paralectotype ♀, abdomen lost (Museum of Comparative Zoology). Remarks. The female specimen in the MCZ which Ricker (1952) selected as lectotype was not labeled as such, but he indicates it is the “complete ♀ specimen” and by elimination, the specimen listed above must be the lectotype. The second MCZ specimen (paralectotype), collected at Laggan, “BC” on 23 August 1902 has no abdomen. We clipped the lectotype abdomen, cleared it and found it to be consistent with the figure of P. occidentalis (Fig. 32) provided by Stark & Kyzar (2000). We also accept the Ricker (1954) synonymy of P. bradleyi with P. occidentalis based on the figures provided by Needham & Claassen (1925) on Plate 41 of that publication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".