Anaphes (Anaphes) iole Girault 1911
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anaphes (Anaphes) iole Girault, 1911 Anaphes iole Girault, 1911 [96]: 284. Holotype ♀ (INHS), lost. TL: USA, Illinois, Urbana, greenhouse window. Girault, 1911 [89]: 135 (nomen nudum, similar to A. pratensis [now A. fuscipennis]); Girault, 1911 [91]: 188 (nomen nudum, male described); Girault, 1912 [107]: 89 (mention); Girault, 1916 [261]: 6 (comparison with A. perdubius); Underhill, 1924: 6 (host); Girault, 1929 [428]: 13 (key); Thompson, 1958: 568 (host catalogue); Burks, 1979: 1030 (catalogue); Schauff, 1984a: 48 (type lost); Huber & Rajakulendran, 1988: 894 (morphological variation); Jones & Jackson, 1990: 463 (fecundity, longevity); Huber, 1992: 36 (key), 41 (description, hosts); Norton et al., 1992: 132 (parasitism in strawberry); Sohati et al., 1992: 515 (percent parasitism); Carillo et al., 1994: 157 (pesticide resistence); De Santis & Fidalgo, 1994: 123 (catalogue) [NT]; Degrandi-Hoffman et al., 1994: 1046 (simulation model); Al-Ghamdi & Stewart, 1995: 458 (synchrony with host); Conti et al., 1996: 10 (host recognition behavior); Norton & Welter, 1996: 1407 (augmentation in strawberry); Rose et al., 1996: 357 (percent parasitism in strawberries; Conti et al., 1997: 91 (oviposition behavior); Hagler & Jackson, 1998: 1010 (immunomarking technique); Jackson et al., 1998: 309 (dispersal prevention); Coutinot & Hoelmer, 1999: 645 (host) [P]; Gokhman, 2000: 1485 (karyotype); McGregor et al., 2000: 89 (hosts, distribution); Nordlund & King, 2000: 63 (biological control); Ruberson & Williams III, 2000: 97 (biological control); Smith & Nordlund, 2000: 122 (mass rearing); Udayagiri & Welter, 2000: 235 (escape from parasitism); Udayagiri et al., 2000a: 88 (pesticide effects); Udayagiri et al., 2000b: 28 (inundative releases); Takasu & Nordland, 2001: 61 (host recognition kairomones); Wu & Nordlund, 2002: 121 (superparasitism); Zhu & Williams III, 2002: 359 (molecular detection in host); Bensen & Rao, 2003: 435 (habitat diversification effects); Beach et al., 2003: 1205 (physiology); Jackson, 2003: 168 (oviposition on host in different plants); Riddick, 2003a: 334 (density and arena size affecting progeny production); Riddick, 2003b: 177 (factors affecting progeny production); Williams III et al., 2003a: 217 (insecticide effects); Williams III et al., 2003b: 534 (insecticide effects); Accinelli et al., 2004: 57 (pest control) [P]; Riddick, 2004: 147 (exposure time and food effects on propagation); Williams & Price, 2004: 164 (bioassay for insecticide toxicity); Manrique et al., 2005: 90 (olfactory responses); Riddick, 2005a: 53 (egg load); Riddick, 2005b: 911 (physiology); Williams III & Roane, 2007: 1262 (nutrition); Williams III & Hendrix, 2008: 23 (physiology); Williams III et al., 2008: 1191 (physiology); Abdullah et al., 2009: 320 (cold storage); Williams III et al., 2011: 160 (chemical ecology); Portilla, 2014: 71 (augmentative release); Boivin & Ellers, 2016: 164 (ovigeny index). Mymar iole: Soyka, 1949a: 331 (implied generic transfer, list); Peck, 1951: 416 (catalogue, generic transfer formalized); Peck, 1963: 39 (catalogue). Anaphes (Anaphes) iole: Yoshimoto, 1990: 52 (list); Viggiani, 1994: 476 (male genitalia), 480 (key); Huber & Thuróczy, 2018: 24 (catalogue). Anaphes iole anomocerus Girault, 1929 [428]: 13. Lectotype ♀ (USNM), designated by Huber, 1992: 42. TL: USA, locality not specified. Synonymy by Huber & Rajakulendran, 1988: 894. Girault, 1929 [428]: 13 (key). Anaphes anomocerus: Strong, 1936: 66 (host); Strong, 1937: 57 (host); Strong, 1938: 52 (host); Ewing & Crawford, 1939: 304 (biology); Thompson, 1958: 568 (host catalogue); Burks, 1979: 1029 (catalogue); Strand, 1986: 107 (physiology); Rajakulendran & Cate, 1986: 255 (laboratory rearing, host). Mymar anomocerus: Soyka, 1949a: 331 (implied generic transfer, list); Peck, 1951: 416 (catalogue, generic transfer formalized); Peck, 1963: 38 (catalogue). Anagrus ovijentatus Crosby & Leonard, 1914a: 181. Lectotype ♀ (CUIC), designated by Huber, 1992: 42. TL: USA, New York, Ithaca. Synonymy (implied) by Girault, 1929 [428]: 14; accepted by Huber & Rajakulendran, 1988: 894. Crosby & Leonard, 1914a: 182 (key); Crosby & Leonard, 1914b: 483 (description, host, distribution); Gahan et al., 1928: 984 (list, host, distribution); Glick, 1939: 48 (collected by airplane); Thompson, 1958: 567 (host catalogue); Hoebeke, 1980: 20 (type catalogue). Anagrus ovijententatus [sic]: Bakkendorf, 1926: 270 (incorrect subsequent spelling). Anaphes ovijentatus: Girault, 1929 [428]: 14 (key, generic transfer, implied synonym of ovijentatus); Romney & Cassidy, 1945: 497 (biology); Clancy & Pierce, 1966: 854 (host); Bryan et al., 1969: 11 (rearing); Stoner & Surber, 1969: 502 (biology); Herting, 1971: 108 (host catalogue); Sillings, 1971: 105 (host, Indiana); Stoner & Surber, 1971: 1566 (biology); Scales, 1973: 305 (distribution); Sillings & Broersma, 1974: 124 (host, distribution); CIBC, 1979: 4 (biological control); Burks, 1979: 1029 (catalogue); Graham & Jackson, 1982: 56 (biology); Collins & Grafius, 1983: 2 (hosts); Jackson & Graham, 1983: 772 (hosts); Graham et al., 1984: 250 (D-vac sampling, host); Jackson & Cohen, 1984: 437 (temperature and water relations); Graham et al., 1986: 132 (parasitism rate); Jackson, 1986: 149 (cold storage); Strand, 1986: 107 (physiology); Coulson, 1987: 7 (mention); Day, 1987: 26 (biological control); Debolt, 1987: 82 (biological control); Gordon et al., 1987: 347 (host); Jackson, 1987: 367 (biology); Jackson & Debolt, 1987: 10 (augmentative releases); Schuster, 1987, 14 (biological control); Snodgrass & Ertle, 1987: 90 (mention); Van Driesche & Hauschild, 1987: 27 (biocontrol); Jackson et al., 1988: 919 (radioactive labelling); Boivin, 1994: 221 (overwintering strategy); Colinet & Boivin, 2011: 89 (cold storage). Mymar ovijentatus: Soyka, 1949a: 332 (implied generic transfer, list); Peck, 1951: 416 (catalogue, generic transfer formalized); Peck, 1963: 39 (catalogue). Anaphoidea perdubius Girault, 1915 [261]: 6. Holotype ♀ (USNM). TL: USA, Utah, Salt Lake City. Synonymy [in key] by Girault, 1929 [428]: 14. Anaphes perdubius: Beyer, 1921: 24 (host); Thompson, 1958: 568 (host catalogue); Burks, 1979: 1029 (generic transfer, catalogue). Mymar perdubius: Soyka, 1949a: 332 (implied generic transfer, list); Peck, 1951: 416 (catalogue, generic transfer formalized); Peck, 1963: 40 (catalogue). Anaphes (Anaphes) perdubius: Yoshimoto, 1990: 52 (list). Anaphes behmani: Flock et al., 1962: 281 [misidentification (Huber 1992: 51)] (incorrect host). Anaphes pallipes: Girault, 1911 [96]: 278 [misidentification (Huber & Rajakulendran 1988: 899)] (description). Anaphes near hercules: Flock et al., 1962: 277 [misidentification (Huber & Rajakulendran 1988: 900)]. Nearctic hosts. Miridae: Halticus bractatus (Say), Lygus hesperus Knight, L. lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois), L. pratensis (L.), Pseudatomoscelis seriatus (Reuter). Distribution. Canada: AB, BC, NT, PE, QC. USA: AK, AZ, CO, FL, ID, IN, LA, MT, NE, NH, NM, NY, OH, OR, TX, VA, WA, WY.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.198 | 0.063 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".