Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alloxysta pallidicornis (Curtis, 1838) Figs 2.32, 5.4 Cynips pallidicornis Curtis, 1838: 688 (April 1). Type: deposited in MVMA (examined). Alloxysta pallidicornis – Quinlan & Fergusson 1981: 254. Diagnosis Alloxysta pallidicornis is easily differentiated from other Alloxysta species by the following combination of features: a completely open radial cell (Fig. 5.4); the presence of pronotal carinae; propodeal carinae that are well-defined, are separated by setae in the anterior half, and form a plate in the posterior half; and antenna with rhinaria beginning on F2 and F1 and a very large length-to-width ratio (Fig. 2.32). Material examined Lectotype UNITED KINGDOM: England: ♀ [Holotype (round label with red margins)], [Holotype of Cynips pallidicornis Curt. det. Fergusson and Quinlan 1980], [Alloxysta forticornis (Gir.) ♀ det J. Quinlan, 1980], [MUS. VIC. ENTO 2011-IIL (green label)], [Lectotype Cynips pallidicornis Curtis ♀ design. M. Ferrer-Suay 2013], [Alloxysta pallidicornis (Curtis, 1838) ♀ M. Ferrer-Suay det. 2011] (MVMA). Distribution Eastern Palaearctic, Nearctic and Nepal. Certain records: England (Curtis 1838: 688; Fergusson 1986: 19), Nepal (Ferrer-Suay et al. 2013i), USA (Evenhuis & Kiriak 1985: 19). Uncertain records: Austria (Giraud 1860: 130), Finland (Hellén 1963: 11), France (Andrews 1978: 83), Germany (Zetterstedt 1838: 410; Taschenberg 1866: 129; Hübner et al. 2002: 507), Norway (Zetterstedt 1838: 410; Hellén 1963: 11), Spain (Torras-Casals 1996: 196), Sweden (Thomson 1862: 408), Canada and USA (Andrews 1978: 54).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.050 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".