Syringophilopsis dendroicae Bochkov and Galloway 2001
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Syringophilopsis dendroicae Bochkov and Galloway, 2001 Syringophilopsis dendroicae Bochkov and Galloway, 2001: 2023, fig. 7. Types deposited in CNC, JBWM and ZISP, examined. Type host: Setophaga coronata (Linnaeus) (Passeriformes: Parulidae). Type locality: Canada (Manitoba). Additional material. Five females and 4 males (UMMZ BMOC #84-1002-3) from Setophaga caerulescens (Gmelin) (Passeriformes: Parulidae), USA: Michigan, St. Clair Co., Port Huron, May 1984, coll. F. E. Ludwig, all material in UMMZ, except 1 female and 1 male in AMU; 4 females and 3 males (UMMZ BMOC #81-0610-1) from Setophaga petechia (Linnaeus) (Parulidae), USA: Michigan, Washtenaw Co., 3mi. W. Dexter, 10 June 1981, coll. B. M. OConnor, all material in UMMZ; 6 females (FMNH FU4272) from Protonotaria citrea (Boddaert) (Parulidae), USA: Florida, Tallahassee Co., Tall Timbers Research Station, 4 April 1958, coll. W. T. Atyeo, all material in FMNH. Host and distribution. Cardellina pusilla (Wilson) (Parulidae) from USA (California) (Skoracki et al. 2008), Protonotaria citrea (Boddaert) (Parulidae) [new host] from USA (Florida) (present paper), Setophaga caerulescens (Gmelin) (Parulidae) [new host] from USA (Michigan) (present paper), S. coronata (Linnaeus) from Canada (Manitoba) (Bochkov & Galloway 2001), S. graciae Baird from USA (Texas) (Skoracki et al. 2008), S. petechia (Linnaeus) [new host] from USA (Michigan) (present paper).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".