Leucania ursula Ursula Wainscot
Bibliographic record
Abstract
32. Leucania ursula (Forbes) Ursula Wainscot (Fig. 58, Map 33) Identification: Forewing length 13–17 mm. Leucania ursula has the same bushy male foretibial scaling as in L. pseudargyria. The forewing and hindwing coloration and pattern is the same as in L. pseudargyria, except there is a more of a ferruginous cast to the forewing ground color in L. pseudargyria, and in L. ursula the forewing is more grayish brown. MAP 33. Collecting localities of Leucania ursula. Leucania ursula can be separated from L. pseudargyria by its smaller size. Leucania inermis lacks the bushy male foretibia present in L. pseudargyria and L. ursula. Flight period: May and August, two broods annually. Collected localities: North Carolina: Haywood Co., Cataloochee, Purchase Knob at lower creek, Purchase Knob at house, Purchase Knob 1.1 rd. mi from house; Swain Co., Big Cove Road site b, Big Cove Road site p, Ravensford, Smokemont. Tennessee: Blount Co., along Scott Mountain Trail campsite 6, Tremont, Cades Cove at Forge Creek Road, Cades Cove Loop at Abrams Creek, Cades Cove at Abrams Creek; Cocke Co., Cosby Ranger Station. (20 specimens) Elevation range: 1390–4000 ft. (424–1219 m) General distribution: This is an eastern species from Ontario in Canada and in the U.S. from Massachusetts south to Florida and west to Iowa and Missouri. Larval hosts: Forbes (1954) listed honeysuckle (Lonicera sp., Caprifoliaceae). Larvae obtained from eggs were reared on crabgrass (Digitaria sp., Poaceae) (Godfrey 1972).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".