Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phytomyza thermarum (Griffiths) (Fig. 85) Material examined. VERMONT: Windham Co., Marlboro, Hogback Mountain, 42.852158, -72.797828, 21.vi.2018, em. 4.vii.2018, C.S. Eiseman, ex Erigeron pulchellus, # CSE4720, CNC1135661 (1♁). Hosts. Asteraceae: Erigeron philadelphicus L. (Griffiths 1976), E. * pulchellus Michx. Larval mine. (Fig. 85) Partly in the stem, petiole, and basal part of the leaf midrib, with whitish linear channels radiating into the blade. These channels are mostly more or less full-depth but may be on the upper or lower surface. Frass is mostly in discrete grains (partly forming beaded strips in most mines according to Griffiths (1976)). Puparium. White or yellowish-white, formed within the mine, either in the petiole or on the lower surface of the blade, with its anterior spiracles projecting ventrally through the epidermis (Griffiths 1976). Phenology and voltinism. This species is evidently multivoltine in western Canada, with larvae collected in early June emerging as adults within two weeks, larvae and puparia collected in mid-July emerging as adults in late July and early August, and those collected in early September emerging as adults within a month (Griffiths 1976). Distribution. * USA: VT; Canada: AB, BC (Griffiths 1976). Mines possibly representing this species have been found on Erigeron philadelphicus in PA (Schultz 2020).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".