Bryotropha gemella Rutten & Karsholt, 2004, sp. n.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bryotropha gemella sp. n. (figs. 6, 24, 25, 38, 46, 56, 76) Type material. Holotype, 1 ɗ: Ottawa, Can. 26.vi.1905, C.H. Young, gen. slide USNM 9885 (USNM). Paratypes, 26 ɗ, 2 Ψ. — CANADA, New Brunswick: 1 ɗ: Chamcook, 15.vi.1938, T.N. Freeman, gen. slide AR 0 546 (CNC). — Nova Scotia: 1 ɗ: Baddeck, 2.vi.1936, J. McDunnough, gen. slide AR 0 528 (CNC); 1 ɗ: S. Milford, 21.VI.1934, J. McDunnough (CNC); 1 ɗ: White Pt. Bch., Queens Co., 16.vii.1934, J. McDunnough, gen. slide AR 0 723 (CNC). — Ontario: 1 ɗ: Ottawa, 19.vii.1905, C.H. Young, gen. slide 4656 R.W. Hodges (CNC); 2 ɗ: ibid., 16.vi.1906; 1 ɗ: ibid., 21.vi.1906; 1 ɗ: Bobcaygeon, 2.vi.1932, J. McDunnough, gen. slide AR 0 649 (CNC); 2 ɗ: ibid., 8.vi.1931 [no abdomen]; 1 ɗ: Minaki, 8.vii.1928, J. McDunnough (CNC); 1 ɗ: Islington, 12.vii.1935, M.S. Parish (USNM); 1 Ψ: Ottawa, 18.vii.1905, C.H. Young, gen. slide USNM 9872 (USNM); 1 ɗ: Sparrow Lake, 9.vii.26, A.F. Braun (USNM); 1 ɗ: ibid., 5.vii.1926. — Québec: 1 ɗ: Bradore Bay, 19.vii.1929, W.J. Brown, gen. slide AR 0 530 [CNC]; 1 ɗ: Terrebonne, lac Brûlé, near SteAgathe, 6.vii.1994, J.F. Landry, at MVL in mixed forest with birch, spruce, fir, maple (CNC); 1 ɗ: ibid., 9.vii.1994, J.F. Landry, daytime on funguscovered logs (CNC); 1 ɗ: ibid., 4.vii.1993, day, on moss growing on a boulder in mixed forest, genitalia slide m MIC 2644; 1 ɗ: Masham, Lake Duncan, ad luc, 15.vi.1985, K. Mikkola leg. (ZMUH). — USA, Michigan: 1 ɗ: Huron MTs, 26.vii.1943, A.F. Braun (USNM); 1 ɗ: ibid., gen. slide USNM 9893 (USNM); 1 Ψ: ibid., 24.vii.1943, gen. slide AR 0 668 (USNM). — New Hampshire: 1 ɗ: Bretton Woods White Mts. 1600 ft., 8.vii.1915, gen. slide USNM 13,527 (USNM); 1 ɗ: ibid., 16.vii.1923, gen. slide USNM 13,528 (USNM); 1 ɗ: 24.vii.1931, Mt. Washington 4000 ft. N.H., gen. slide USNM 13,526 (USNM). — Virginia: 1 ɗ: Mountain Lake, 14–21.vi.1907, A. Braun (USNM). Diagnosis. Large brownish species with distinct stigmata. Description. Adult (fig. 6). Wingspan 15–16 mm (male), 13–14 mm (female). Labial palpus without a brush underneath segment 2 and with segment 3 shorter than segment 2; ochreous to pale ochreous on the inner side, slightly darker on the outer side. Antenna dark brown very indistinctly ringed with ochreous. Head with frons pale ochreous to dark ochreous brown; vertex, thorax and tegula concolorous with forewing. Forewing dark ochreous brown, suffused with pale ochre; all stigmata very distinct, first plical obsolete; first discal beyond second plical; costal and tornal patches pale ochreous, fused to form a rather indistinct, angulated fascia; termen lined with distinct patches of blackish scales; cilia ochreousbrown with one or more ciliary lines and pale ochreous tips. Hindwing fuscous gray to fuscous brown all over; cilia concolorous, with one to several ciliary lines. Variation. The material examined shows little variation. Individual specimens may be slightly darker or paler due to varying amounts of ochreous scales on the forewing. Similar species. Very similar to B. galbanella q.v. The label data indicates that B. galbanella has an arctic range whereas B. gemella is found in more temperate regions, suggesting that these species are allopatric. Male genitalia (figs. 24, 25, 38, 56). Uncus broad, subrectangular. Socius usually with 4 or 5 setae. Gnathos slender, clearly thickened at bend, base with microtrichia. Thornshield triangular, without spikes. Vinculum often covered with microtrichia but occasionally without. Apex of aedeagus with long (>200 µm) whip. Resembling B. galbanella q.v. Female genitalia (fig. 46) Segment VIII with many microtrichia. Lamella postvaginalis small, with a narrow median extension reaching to the middle of segment VIII. The bulbous structure marking the distal end of the ventral groove not extending beyond the distal rim of segment VIII. Ventral groove very distinct, with curved margins. Dorsal side of segment VIII weakly concave. Signum large and clearly elongate, with two transverse folds; distal and proximal ends densely covered with small spikes, middle part with only few spikes. Separated from B. galbanella by the shape of the lamella postvaginalis. Biology. Immature stages are unknown. Adults were collected from early June to late August, probably in one generation, at altitudes of up to 500 m. Several specimens were recorded during the day in forested areas, suggesting that the biology of this species may be similar to that of B. galbanella. Like B. galbanella, females of B. gemella are rarely collected: only two were present among the 29 specimens examined. Distribution (fig. 76). Recorded from the northeast part of the USA and the adjoining southeast part of Canada. Etymology. An adjective: gemellus: twin, referring to the similarity to B. galbanella; here in feminine in concordance with the female gender of Bryotropha.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".