Hydrosmittia Ferrington Jr & Saether 2011, gen. n.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key to male imagines of Hydrosmittia gen. n. 1. Phallapodeme with well sclerotized hook-like apical projection ending in 2–3 distinct, sharp teeth; virga apparently without lateral groups of spinules; superior volsella barely indicated; Japan..... H. togadistalis (Sasa, Watanabe et Arakawa) (p. 111) – Phallapodeme without hook-like apical projection or if present very weekly sclerotized; virga consisting of median single spine, sometimes difficult to distinguish, and two rows of lateral spinules superior volsella absent or indicated as basal swelling of inner margin of gonocoxite............................................................................ 2 2. AR 0.15–0.35, costa not extended......................................................................... 3 – AR 0.38–2.02, costal extension 9–103 µm long, often with additional false vein.................................... 4 3. AR about 0.35, R 4+5 ending proximal to apex of M 3+4, lateral spinules of virga fused and sclerotized (Fig. 40 E); Canada................................................................................... H. setaven a (Saether)(p. 116) – AR about 0.15, R 4+5 ending distal to apex of M 3+4, lateral spinules of virga not strongly sclerotized (Fig. 35 D); Palaearctic............................................................................... H. brevicornis Strenzke (p. 107) 4. Anal point parallel-sided for most of its length, about 46 µm long, gonostylus widest at apex with well developed heel (Fig. 50 F); Norway...................................................................... H. aagaardi sp. n. (p. 139) – Anal point triangular, 0–43 µm long; gonostylus with or without heel............................................ 5 5. Transverse sternapodeme without oral projections, inner verticals present......................................... 6 – Transverse sternapodeme with oral projections, inner verticals present or absent.................................... 8 6. Gonostylus tapering to narrow apex (Fig. 37 E); Tanzania................................ H. tenuistylata sp. n. (p.111) – Gonostylus not tapering................................................................................ 7 7. Tergite I–III and most of VI and VII pale; Tanzania....................................... H. annulata sp. n. (p. 114) – No pale tergites; Tanzania............................................................ H. soelii sp. n. (p. 112) 8. Inner verticals (1–2) conspicuous, up to 40–60 µm long; accessory lobe of inferior volsella adpressed to gonocoxite; gonostylus with more or less well developed outer heel (Fig. 42 F); AR 0.38–0.71; Holarctic....... H. oxoniana (Edwards) (p. 120) – Inner verticals absent, or if occasionally present as in some specimens of H. ruttneri short and inconspicuous; accessory lobe of inferior volsella well developed, usually free at apex; gonostylus without distinct outer heel; AR 0.44–2.02..............9 9. False vein indistinct, AR 2.02, wing length 2.3 mm, LR 1 0.47; Japan.......... H. kisotriangulata (Sasa et Kondo) (p.109) – False vein indistinct or conspicuous, AR 0.44–1.37, wing length 1.2–2.7 mm..................................... 10 10. False vein continuing from R 4+5, conspicuous, making the costal extension indistinguishable in most specimens, wing length 2.1–2.7 mm, LR 1 0.46–0.50; Kenya................................................ H. falsicostata sp. n. (p. 134) – False vein indistinct and evanescent, wing length 1.2–1.8 mm, LR 1 0.38–0.45; Holarctic.............................................................................................. H. ruttneri (Strenzke et Thienemann) (p. 129)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".