MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893874000 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6059936

Townesilitus bicolor Wesmael 1835

2016· article· en· W6893874000 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolarcticMacrosiphum euphorbiaeDistribution (mathematics)GenusHabit

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Townesilitus bicolor (Wesmael, 1835) Distribution in Iran. Golestan (Samin et al. 2015 as Perilitus (Townesilitus) bicolor (Wesmael)), Guilan (Farahani et al. 2013b; Sedighi and Madjdzadeh 2015), Isfahan (Ghahari et al. 2011a; Sedighi and Madjdzadeh 2015), Mazandaran (Farahani et al. 2013b, 2014; Sedighi and Madjdzadeh 2015), Semnan (Samin et al. 2011). Distribution outside Iran. One of the most common braconid species in the Holarctic region (Papp 2011– 2012). Albania, Serbia (Žikić et al. 2000; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus (Townesilitus) bicolor), Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, former Yugoslavia (Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus (Townesilitus) bicolor), Belgium (Wesmael 1835 as Microctonus bicolor; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus (Townesilitus) bicolor), Canada (Wylie 1988; Sharanowski et al. 2014), Croatia (Papp 2010; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus (Townesilitus) bicolor), Czech Republic (Lozan et al. 2010; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus (Townesilitus) bicolor; Koldaş et al. 2013), Greece (Papp 2007; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus (Townesilitus) bicolor), Hungary (Szépligeti 1896 as Townesilitus bicolor; Györfi 1959; Papp 2006, 2008; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus (Townesilitus) bicolor), Turkey (Yilmaz et al. 2010), UK (Broad and Shaw 2009; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus (Townesilitus) bicolor). Host records. Aphthona euphorbiae (Schrank), A. violacea (Koch), Chaetocnema aridula (Gyllenhal), C. hortensis Geoffray, Longitarsus ballotae (Marsham), Phartora vitellinae (Linnaeus), P. at r a (Fabricius), P. cruciferae (Goeze), P. diademata Foudras, P. nemorum (Linnaeus), P. striolata (Fabricius), P. undulata (Kutschera), P. vittula Redtenbacher, Phylliodes attenuata (Koch) (Coleoptera: Chrysomeloidea), Dendrolimus pini (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) (Yu et al. 2012). In Israel, it is reported from Coniocleonus excoriatus (Gyllenhal) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) (Papp 2011–2012).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207