MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893900763 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6869703

Sorex rohweri R. L.. Rausch, Feagin & V. R. Rausch 2007

2018· article· en· W6893900763 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBanana Cultivation and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShrewSorexDorsumAraneusLineage (genetic)Range (aeronautics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

59. Olympic Shrew Sorex rohweri French: Musaraigne de Rohwer / German: RohwerSpitzmaus / Spanish: Musarana de Olympic Other common names: Rohwer's Shrew Taxonomy. Sorex rohwer: R. L.. Rausch, Feagin & V. R. Rausch, 2007, “ Olympic Peninsula, Washington State, near Quilcene, Penny Creek, at lat. 47°51’ N, long. 122°57W.” Sorex rohweri was only recently described as a distinct species from S. cinereus (which it was originally misidentified as) and is in the S. cinereus group and subgenus Ofisorex. S. rohweri seems to represent a basal lineage in the S. cinereus group (¢.870.000 years ago) and probably diverged early in the evolutionary history of the group. Monotypic. Distribution. SW Canada (SW British Columbia) and NW USA (W Washington and NW Oregon). Descriptive notes. Head-body 47-69 mm, tail 37-49 mm, hindfoot 10-13 mm. No specific data are available for body weight. The Olympic Shrew is small to mediumsized and externally similar to the Masked Shrew (S. cinereus). Dorsum is dark brown, and venter is slightly lighter. Tail averages 78% (63-100%) of head-body length and is uniformly dark brown. Teeth are pigmented dark red and are typically paler than in the Masked Shrew and Vagrant Shrew (S. vagrans). Upper incisors of the Olympic Shrew have wider interdenticular space (being more V-shaped) than in the Masked Shrew. There are five unicuspids, gradually getting slightly smaller from first to fourth, with fifth being minute compared with the other four. Habitat. Primarily lowland mature stands in temperate moist forests from sea level up to elevations of ¢.700 m. Olympic Shrews are also occasionally found in areas in which forests have been cleared or degraded. Food and Feeding. No information. Breeding. No information. Activity patterns. No information. Movements, Home range and Social organization. No information. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. The Olympic Shrew has a relatively wide distribution and can be found in disturbed habitats, indicating that it is tolerant of human activity. Very little is known of its ecology. Bibliography. Cassola (2017a), Hope et al. (2012), Nagorsen & Panter (2009), Rausch et al. (2007), Woodman & Fisher (2016).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0810.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBanana Cultivation and ResearchFrench-language works237,207