Bibliographic record
Abstract
Procladius Skuse Seven species of Procladius were found in the light traps from Lake Winnipeg. Of these, however, two species were never caught with certainty in the bottom samples. The other five belonged to the most common species of the benthos (Fig. 1). Adults of all five common species were caught from the beginning of June to the middle of September (Figs. 3, 5, 7, 9, 11). Pupae or first and second instars of P. culiciformis were present from early June to early October (Fig. 5), in early June to early September for P. freemani (Fig. 9), from early June to end of August for P. denticulatus (Fig. 7), in June and July for P. sublettei (Fig. 11), and in July for P. bellus (Fig. 3). The individual species within the genus Procladius are among the most difficult to determine within the Tanypodinae both as imagines and as immatures. Kobayashi (1998) showed that body size and male genital structures varied seasonally in Procladius choreus (Meigen). The smallest imagines, which were observed in summer, were reduced to about 60 % of the largest ones in wing length, while the gonostylus had a longer posterior heel in spring and fall. Since the length and shape of the gonostylus heel is used as one of the important genital characters in discriminating species of Procladius the separation of several species becomes doubtful. About 20 species of Procladius are known from the Nearctic region and more than 60 from the Palaearctic region many of them likely synonyms. The genus is in urgent need of taxonomic revision especially of species outside the Nearctic region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".