Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Climaciella Enderlein, 1910 Type species: Mantispa brunnea Say in Keating, 1824: 309. The genus Climaciella comprises conspicuous and colorful mantispids. Little is known about this group whose species have a remarkable pattern of Batesian mimicry with polistine wasps (Opler 1981; Hoffman et al. 2017). However, some behavioral and ecological aspects of the Central and North American species Climaciella brunnea Say have been studied (Opler 1981). The rest of the Climaciella species inhabit across of the Neotropical region and for these species their respective models have not been identified. Immature stages are likely associated with spiders of the families Ctenidae and Lyscosidae, and the larvae of C. brunnea have been reported to be spider boarders (Redborg 1998). The genus is composed by eight species with a distribution ranging from southern Canada to northern Argentina, including the Greater Antilles (Hoffman 2002; Ohl 2004). Four species were recorded for Colombia. Climaciella amapaensis from Risaralda, C. porosa from the lowlands of the Anchicayá basin in the department of Valle del Cauca, C. semihyalina from the Colombian Amazonia and C. obtusa from the Colombian Pacific coast and Caribbean region (Ardila-Camacho & García 2015). The genus is easily distinguished by the flagellum possessing flagellomeres three times wider than long at midlength in anterior view, pronotum straight or angled at midlength in lateral view, pterothorax with mesoscutal furrow not apparent, and anterior half of wings light to dark amber (Hoffman 1992; Machado & Rafael 2010).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".