Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paramerina fragilis (Walley) (Fig. 8 B–F) Material examined. CANADA: Manitoba, Lake Winnipeg, Hecla Island, light trap, 1 male, 24.viii. 1971, M.P. McLean (CNC). The male is characterized by having faintly banded wings, tergite II and V light colored, LR1 of about 0.79, dorsocentrals bi-triserial, and, in the present specimen, the nearly complete lack of any inferior volsella on the gonocoxite. Male (n = 1). Total length 3.02 mm. wing length 1.76 mm. Total length/wing length 1.71. wing length/profemur 2.40. T I, II, V and IX pale, with slight infuscation in anterior half; other tergites with basal 2/3 brown. Wing with faint banding. Head. AR 1.51. Temporals 13. Clypeus with 26 setae. Cibarial pump, tentorium, and stipes as in Fig. 8 B. Tentorium 167 µm long. Palp lengths (in µm): 38, 67, 186, 158, 300. Thorax (Fig. 8 C). Antepronotum with 4 setae. Dorsocentrals 45, double to triple, including 14 humerals; acrostichals 43; prealars 15; supraalar 1. Scutellum with 23 setae. Wing (Fig. 8 D). VR 0.89. Brachiolum with 2 setae, R with 70 setae, R1 with 62 setae, R4+5 with 98 setae. Squama with 25 setae. Legs. Spur of front tibia (Fig. 8 E) 42 µm long, spurs of middle tibia (Fig. 8 E) 54 µm and 32 µm long, of hind tibia (Fig. 8 E) 58 µm and 24 µm long. Width at apex of front tibia 44 µm, of middle tibia 43 µm, of hind tibia 47 µm. Tarsal segments of p2 and p3 lost. Lengths and proportions of front leg as in Table 2. Femur of p2 834 µm long, of p3 736 µm long. Tibia of p2 748 µm long, of p3 975 µm long. fe ti ta1 ta2 ta3 ta4 ta5 LR BV SV p1 736 859 681 380 245 190 98 0.79 2.34 2.49 Hypopygium (Fig. 8 F). T IX and laterosternite IX without setae. Phallapodeme 117 µm long. Gonocoxite 216 µm long, nearly without any sign of a inferior volsella; gonostylus 140 µm long. HR 1.54, HV 2.15. Remarks. This male appear to belong to P. fragilis (Walley) (Roback1971: 271) in the abdominal pattern, wing pattern and high LR1. However, the hypopygium of P. fragilis (Roback 1971 fig. 520) has a very well-developed inferior volsella on the gonocoxite, while this specimen has only a faint indication of a lobe, i.e. about as in P. smithae (Sublette) (Roback 1971 fig. 528) and P. okigenga (Sasa) (Niitsuma et al. 2011 fig. 17). P. o k i g e n g a also has the same abdominal pattern, but is without a wing pattern and has a lower antennal ratio. According to B. Bilyj (pers. comm.), however, the “inferior volsella” is a flap or even a lobe created as a slide preparation artifact. Bilyj has mounted long series of P. fragilis, but never found the basal lobe as projecting as the one shown by Roback (1971 fig. 520). Distribution. The species is known from the Northwest Territories to Quebec and British Columbia to Quebec and Massachusetts, Oregon and Virginia (Bilyj 1984: 666, Oliver et al. 1990: 13, Ashe & O’Connor 2009: 190).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".