Megachile gemula Cresson, new comb.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
gemula Cresson, new comb. Megachile gemula Cresson 1878: 118. Male (not female). Type locality: Georgia [U.S.A.]. Megachile carbonaria Cresson 1879: 208. Female. Type locality: Nevada [U.S. A]. (Not M. carbonaria Smith 1853: 179 [Northern India]. Synonymy of Friese 1911: 236. Megachile Vancouverensis Provancher 1888: 424. Male. Type locality: Vancouver [Canada]. Synonymy of Mitchell 1962: 135. Megachile avara Cresson 1878: 123. Male. Type locality: Georgia [U.S.A.]. Synonymy of Mitchell 1935b: 181. Megachile cressonii Dalla Torre 1896: 427. New name for Megachile carbonaria Cresson. Megachile albula Lovell and Cockerell 1907: 18 19. Male. Type locality: Southern Maine [U.S.A.]. Synonymy of Mitchell 1962: 135. Megachile gemula albula Cockerell 1913a: 531. New status. Megachile vancouverensis Cockerell 1913a: 531. Emendation. Megachile vandykei Cockerell 1925a: 205. Female. Synonymy of Hurd 1979: 2059. Megachile (Delomegachile) gemula Mitchell 1935b: 181 185. Megachile (Delomegachile) gemula var. cressonii Mitchell 1935b: 185. Megachile gemula var. fulvogemula Mitchell 1935b: 185 186. Female. Type locality: Cloudcroft, New Mexico [U.S.A.]. Synonymy of Hurd 1979: 2060. Megachile avaria Hurd 1979: 2060 (Misspelling). Megachile (Delomegachile) gemula cressonii Hurd 1979: 2059. Megachile (Delomegachile) gemula gemula Hurd 1979: 2060.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".