Atheta (Datomicra) dadopora Thomson 1867
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atheta (Datomicra) dadopora Thomson, 1867 (Fig. 105 in Strand & Vik 1964 (as At. celata); Figs. 15: 5 in Benick & Lohse 1974, p. 189) Atheta dadopora Thomson, 1867: 283. Datomicra decolorata Casey, 1910a: 120, syn. nov. Datomicra inopia Casey, 1910a: 120, syn. nov. Datomicra schematica Casey, 1910a: 121, syn. nov. Datomicra stilla Casey, 1910a: 123, syn. nov. Atheta (Datomicra) dadopora: Fenyes, 1920: 220 (as synonym of At. celata (Erichson, 1837)). Atheta (Datomicra) decolorata: Fenyes, 1920: 220 (as preoccupied name). Atheta (Datomicra) inopia: Fenyes, 1920: 220 (as valid species). Atheta (Datomicra) schematica: Fenyes, 1920: 220 (as valid species). Atheta (Datomicra) stilla: Fenyes, 1920: 220 (as valid species). Atheta (Datomicra) dadopora: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 667 (as synonym of At. celata (Erichson, 1837)). Atheta (Datomicra) decolorata: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 668 (as preoccupied name). Atheta (Datomicra) inopia: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 668 (as valid species). Atheta (Datomicra) schematica: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 668 (as valid species). Atheta (Datomicra) stilla: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 668 (as valid species). Atheta (Datomicra) celata: Strand & Vik, 1964: 330 (misidentification). Atheta (Datomicra) dadopora: Benick & Lohse, 1974: 189 (as valid species). Atheta (Datomicra) decolorata: Moore & Legner, 1975: 358 (as valid species). Atheta (Datomicra) inopia: Moore & Legner, 1975: 363 (as valid species). Atheta (Datomicra) schematica: Moore & Legner, 1975: 373 (as valid species). Atheta (Datomicra) stilla: Moore & Legner, 1975: 374 (as valid species). Datomicra decolorata: Seevers, 1978: 259 (as valid species). Datomicra inopia: Seevers, 1978: 259 (as valid species). Datomicra schematica: Seevers, 1978: 259 (as valid species). Datomicra stilla: Seevers, 1978: 259 (as valid species). Type material. Lectotype of Datomicra decolorata (here designated): ♂, “N.[ew] Y.[ork, Catskill Mts.]”, “ decolorata Csy. ”, “TYPE USNM 39163” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Paralectotypes: 11 specimens, “N.[ew] Y.[ork, Catskill Mts.]”, “ decolorata PARATYPE USNM 39163” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Lectotype of Datomicra inopia (here designated): ♂, “N.[ew] Y.[ork, Catskill Mts.]”, “ inopia Csy. ”, “TYPE USNM 39164” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Paralectotypes: 21 specimens, “N.[ew] Y.[ork, Catskill Mts.]”, “ inopia PARATYPE USNM 39164” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Lectotype of Datomicra schematica (here designated): ♂, “Penn.[sylvania, Philadelphia]”, “ schematica Csy. ”, “TYPE USNM 39165” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Paralectotypes: ♂, 2♀♀, “Penn.[sylvania, Philadelphia]”, “ schematica PARATYPE USNM 39165” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Lectotype of Datomicra stilla (here designated): ♂, “R.[hode] I.[sland, Boston Neck]”, “ stilla Csy. ”, “TYPE USNM 39170” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Paralectotypes: 6 specimens, “R.[hode] I.[sland, Boston Neck]”, “ stilla PARATYPE USNM 39170” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Additional material. BELARUS’: ♀, Belovezhskaya Pushcha Nature Reserve, on Ganoderma, 11.vii.1994 (V.Tsinkevich) (SPSU); CANADA: Newfoundland: ♂, ♀, Long Range Mts., 50º34’40”N 56º57’35”W, 1500’, 26.vii.1969 (M.J.D.Brendell); ♂, Trappers Cove, from fungi, 8.viii.1969 (M.J.D.Brendell) (BMNH); UNITED STATES: New York: Orange Co.: ♀, 8 km S New Windsor, Black Rock Forest, 23–25.v.1998 (V.I.Gusarov) (SPSU); 2♂♂, ditto but pitfall traps, vi.1998 (V.Ovcharenko) (SPSU). Diagnosis. See Benick & Lohse (1974). Discussion. The types of Dat. decolorata, Dat. inopia, Dat. schematica and Dat. stilla do not differ from examined European specimens of At. dadopora. Distribution. Atheta dadopora is a common European species. In North America At. dadopora is known from Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania and Newfoundland. This is the first record of this species from North America.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".