Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Leptomantispa Hoffman, 2002 Type species: Mantispilla pulchella Banks, 1912: 179. The genus Leptomantispa is scarcely collected and very uncommon in museums. Species of this genus are apparently arboreal, and are likely difficult to collect. Perhaps the best way to collect specimens is by light traps. Until now the genus is composed of nine valid species occurring from southwestern Canada to northern Argentina, including the Antilles (Ohl 2004; Machado & Rafael 2010; Ardila-Camacho & García 2015; Hoffman et al. 2017). From Colombia only one species has been reported, L. hoffmani Ardila-Camacho from the department of Risaralda. The genus can be distinguished because the presence of numerous fine setae on the entire dorsal surface of the pronotum, arising flush with the pronotal surface; body color pattern consisting in mixtures of yellow and brown; male abdominal tergites 4 and 5 and sometimes 3, bearing pores; male ectoproct with ventromedial lobe not sclerotized; gonarcal membrane without scales. Female spermatheca widening distally (Hoffman 2002; Machado & Rafael 2010). Here we reported the second species from Colombia, L. axillaris (Navás), collected in the departments of Antioquia and Sucre in the norther part of the country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".