Bibliographic record
Abstract
Liriomyza taraxaci Hering (Fig. 153) Material examined. MASSACHUSETTS: Franklin Co., Northfield, 276 Old Wendell Rd., 21.viii.2014, em. 4.ix.2014, C.S. Eiseman, ex Taraxacum officinale, #CSE1378, CNC384896 (1♂); Hampshire Co., Pelham, Quarry St., 6.vii.2013, em. 17.vii.2013, C.S. Eiseman, ex Taraxacum officinale, #CSE708, CNC392638 (1♀). Hosts. Asteraceae: Lactuca L. (Scheffer & Lonsdale 2018), Taraxacum officinale F.H. Wigg.; specimens reared from L. sativa L. in Washington have been tentatively assigned to this species (Lonsdale 2017). Spencer (1969) reported Cichorium intybus L. as a host based on empty leaf mines. Leaf mine. (Fig. 153) Upper surface; a rapidly widening serpentine mine, centrally suffused with brown, expanding into a whitish blotch. Frass is in sparsely scattered black grains. The mine of the unconfirmed female specimen had conspicuous feeding lines in the blotch but was otherwise identical. Puparium. Yellow-orange; formed outside the mine. Distribution. USA: AK, IL, *MA, NY (Scheffer & Lonsdale 2018), WA?, WI (leaf mines only); Canada: AB, BC, MB, NB, ON, QC, SK, YT; Europe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".