MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893987070 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5921915

Paramormia furcata

2019· article· en· W6893987070 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFossil Insects in Amber
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsType localityType (biology)LocalityType species

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paramormia furcata (Kincaid) Fig. 2F Pericoma furcatus Kincaid, 1899: 34. Type locality USA (Washington, Pullman). Pericoma trialbawhoria Haseman, 1907: 306. Type locality USA (Missouri, Columbia). Psychoda annulipes Johnson, 1913: 43. Type locality USA (Florida). Psychoda autumnalis Banks, 1914: 127. Type locality USA (Washington, D. C.) Pericoma littoralis Dyar, 1926: 107. Type locality USA (California). Telmatoscopus furcatus: Quate 1955: 169 (redescription, taxonomic history). Duckhousiella furcata: Vaillant 1973: 349; Quate 1996: 36. Paramormia furcata: Ibañez-Bernal 2008: 96. First record from Uruguay. 2♀ Bella Unión, 30°15'22"S; 57°36'15"W, 8 December 2013. 1♂ Paysandú, 32°17'49"S; 58° 3'54"W, 15 April 2015. 1♀ Isla Rica, 30°31'60"S; 57°52'60"W, 13 November 1978. 1♀ Villa Constitución, 31°04’02"S; 57°51’04"W, 17 May 1980. Remarks. The species can be identified by the spot pattern on the wing, and the shape of the female subgenital plate (Figure 2F). Male and female characteristics are presented in detail in Ibañez-Bernal (2008). A discussion on the generic status of the species in the neotropical region is presented in Bravo & Souza (2008). P. furcata is distributed in Canada (British Columbia), USA, Mexico, Costa Rica, and Brazil, being the only known Paramormia species occuring in the neotropics (Ibañez-Bernal 2008).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0720.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFossil Insects in AmberFrench-language works237,207