Clinotanypus (Clinotanypus) pinguis Loew
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinotanypus (Clinotanypus) pinguis (Loew) (Fig. 2 A–E) Material examined. CANADA: Manitoba, Lake Winnipeg, Beaver Creek, emergence trap, 1 male, 21.vi. 1969; Narrows, 3 larvae, 9.vii. –10.ix.1969. To the description of the male by Roback (1971: 18) the following can be added: Anepisternum II with about 8 setae, preepisternum with about 48 setae, sensilla chaetica absent. The head capsule lengths of the Lake Winnipeg larvae are 700 µm for the fourth instar, 370–420 µm (2) for the third instars. Distribution and ecology. The species is present in small ponds, lakes and rivers. It seems to prefer soft mud, occasionally with some sand in shallow areas (Roback 1976: 194). It is known from Romania, Russia and Turkey, and from Manitoba and Ontario in Canada and widespread in USA (Roback 1976: 193, Oliver et al. 1990: 8; Spies 1999; Epler 2003, 2010; Caldwell 2009; Saether & Spies 2004; Ashe & O’Connor 2009: 138).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".