Biphallapodema oligodentata Papp, 2014, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biphallapodema oligodentata sp. nov. (Figs 17–27) Type material. Holotype male (HNHM, body in a canada balsam preparation, abdomen with synsternite as well as genitalia with a part of S8 separated, and kept in a plastic microvial with glycerol): CONGO: Brazzaville, ORSTOM park, soil traps in forest, 2. I. 1964.—14 days, leg. J. Balogh & A. Zicsi—Hung. Soil-Zool. Exp., Congo No. 572. Paratypes (HNHM): 2 males 1 female (in a canada balsam preparation, males’ abdomen and genitalia in a plastic microvial with glycerol): ibid., 21. XI. 1963 - soil traps in forest, 3 days, No. 219. 1 male 2 females, 1 male 1 female (in 2 canada balsam preparations, abdomen and genitalia of the latter male in a plastic microvial with glycerol): ibid., soil traps around leaf-compost, No. 219, 16. XI. 1963, 20 days. Description. Measurements in mm: body length 1.50 (holotype), 1.42–1.60 (paratypes); wing length 1.20 (holotype), 1.14–1.28 (paratypes); wing width 0.58 (holotype), 0.57–0.60 (paratypes). The two species of the genus differ in details of the male and female genitalia. Thus, only those characteristics are described below. Male. Sternite 5 (Figs. 21–22) with a not divided broad medio-caudal emargination, which bears a pair of processes of 5–6 long flat pegs each. Surstylus (Fig. 25) with anterior part narrower than in B. polydentata. Basiphallus (Figs 23, 26) larger but epiphallus thinner than in B. polydentata. Distiphallus (Figs 26–27) with a large ventrally curved apical process, which is dentate on margins; an additional dorsal process also present. Postgonite (Figs 23–24) seems more strongly connected to the lower branch of connecting sclerite than in B. polydentata. Postgonite with a blunt caudal, as well as a very broad apical lobe each. Female sternite 8 (Fig. 17) weakly sclerotised, covered by small hairs, except anterior margin, sternite 8 bears some very short setulae only. Hypoproct (Fig. 18) strongly sclerotised on a broad caudal rim, medial part membranous, its strong caudal part bears 2–3 upcurved setae in ventral view. Epiproct (Fig. 19) comparatively large with minute hairs, except antero-lateral parts; its setal pair thin but long. Cercus (Fig. 19) normal in shape, each with a pair of very long apical and medial pair of setae. Spermathecae (Fig. 20) peculiar in shape: proximodistally flattened with a subcylindrical, more sclerotised inner part, sclerotised parts of ducts short with a bulbous distal end each. That is, common duct of paired spermathecae very short, its bulb occupies more than half of it. Etymology. The specific epithet of this new species (‘oligodentata’ = a few teeth) refers to the low-numbered (5 each) pegs on the pair of processes on male sternite 5.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".