Leptostigma alaemacula Archibald & Rasnitsyn 2023, n. sp.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leptostigma alaemacula n. sp. http://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: CB061CC9-BB17-4FED-B536-2A35796FCBBA Fig. 21. Holotype. SR 92-18 - 08 (Fig. 21). A forewing, collected by Carma Henry at Republic on September 25, 1992, in the collections of the SR. Diagnosis. Distinguished from other species of Leptostigma by a combination of forewing dark in cell 1r+2rm. Tentatively diagnostic: R+M shorter than 1-M; 2r-rs joins cell 3rm distinctly near its middle; 2r-m joins M scarcely basal to 2m-cu; anal cells widely separated by fusion of 1A and 2A+3A, without crossvein. Description. Holotype. Forewing length 14.2 mm, maximum width 4.1 mm, length/width 3.5; membrane lightly infuscate throughout except darker posterior to 1r-rs; pterostigma dark; R+M shorter than 1-M; maximum length of cell 2r shorter than 3r; 2r-rs shorter than Rs between 2r-m, 2r-rs, joining cell 3rm near its middle; 2r-m slightly curved, joins Rs notably basal to 2m-cu joining M, aligned with 2mcu; 1-M almost straight, sub-parallel to 1m-cu; 3r-m distinctly bowed toward base; cell 2mcu with M longer than 1m-cu; 2m-cu curved distinctly toward base; cu-a postfurcal; anal cells separated for distance greater than width of cell 2a, without crossvein between them. Remarks. Differs from L. brevilatum n. sp., L. longiclava n. sp., L. longipallidum n. sp., L. longitenebricum n. sp. by its forewing dark posterior to 1r-rs and 2r-m joins M close to 2m-cu. Differs from L. proxivena n. sp. and L. fasciatum n. sp. in which the anal cells are not separated by a fusion of 1A with 2A+3A. Material. Holotype. Etymology. From the Latin ala, meaning wing, and macula, spot, referring to the forewing spot. The epithet is a noun in apposition. Locality and age. Republic, Washington, United States of America, Tom Thumb Tuff Member of the Klondike Mountain Formation exposure A0307; mid-Ypresian.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".