MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6894020322 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6728093

Oligoryzomys fulvescens

2017· article· en· W6894020322 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAraliaceaeSubspeciesLeucasDorsumPorcupineBarbel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

427. Fulvous Pygmy Rice Rat Oligoryzomys fulvescens French: Colilargo fauve / German: Gelbbraune Zwergreisratte / Spanish: Rata arrocera pigmea leonada Other common names: Fulvous Colilargo, Northern Pygmy Rice Rat Taxonomy. Hesperomys fulvescens Saussure, 1860, “ Mexique.” Restricted by C. H. Merriam in 1901 to Orizaba, Veracruz, Mexico. Six subspecies are recognized. Subspecies and Distribution. O. f. fulvescens Saussure, 1860 — E Mexico, most of Guatemala, S Belize, El Salvador, and Honduras. O.f.engraciaeOsgood,1945—lowlandsofNEMexico. O.f.lenisGoldman,1915—lowlandsofWMexico. O.f.mayensisGoldman,1918—YucatanPeninsulaofMexico,NEGuatemala,andN&CBelize. O.f.mnicaraguaeJ.A.Allen,1910—NWNicaragua. O. f. pacificus Hooper, 1952 — Pacific coast of extreme SW Mexico. Descriptive notes. Head—body 75-89 mm, tail 82-116 mm, ear 12-14 mm, hindfoot 19-24 mm; weight 10-17-5 g. Although some variation in size is evident (slightly larger individuals occur in the south of the distribution), the Fulvous Pygmy Rice Rat is the smallest of the Central American species of Oligoryzomys. Dorsum is pale tawny to reddish brown, flecked with bright buffy and dark hairs giving streaked or variegated appearance. Underparts are pale, whitish gray; over hairs may be entirely white to their bases, especially on throat and chest, or with light gray basal bands. Buffy overwash is present in some specimens; lateral ocherous stripe is prominent. Feet are covered with dense white hair; typical of the genus,tail is much longer (125-150%) than head—body length and slightly bicolor. Habitat. Common in dry forests, generally associated with riparian zones, patches of succulents, or even tree ferns; old fields with herbaceous-woody plant combinations; but rare in mature forest with sparse understory from near sea level to elevations of c.1500 m. In general, the Fulvous Pygmy Rice Rat occurs in open grassy and weedy habitats, suggesting that they might be more abundant in disturbed habitats than in pristine forests. Food and Feeding. The Fulvous Pygmy Rice Rat is mostly granivorous (up to 80% of stomach contents contained seeds) and insectivorous, but dietary preferences change seasonally up to 100% granivorous. Breeding. Reproduction of the Fulvous Pygmy Rice Rat apparently occurs year-round because females with embryos were reported in January, July, and November; scrotal males were reported in July-August. Pregnant females carrying an average of four embryos (range 3-6) were found in Nicaragua. Activity patterns. The Fulvous Pygmy Rice Rat is nocturnal and semi-arboreal; it uses understory vegetation while moving through its habitat. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Juvenile Fulvous Pygmy Rice Rats are more numerous than adults, suggesting that longevity is less than one year. There is strong segregation between females that prefer mostly forested habitats (presumably for protection against aerial predators) and males that venture toward open spaces. Fulvous Pygmy Rice Rats sometimes make up 30% of rodent biomass in occupied habitats. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. Bibliography. Alvarez et al. (1984), Baker & Villa (1954), Baltensperger & Brown (2015), Carleton & Musser(1995), Castro-Arellano & Lacher (2009), Dowler & Engstrom (1988), Engilis et al. (2012), Goldman (1918a), Hall (1981), Hall & Dalquest (1963), Hooper (1952c), Jones & Engstrom (1986), Kirkpatrick & Cartwright (1975), Landmann et al. (2008), McPherson (1985, 1986), Medellin (1994), Merriam (1901a), Nowak (1991), Osgood (1945a), Owen & Girén (2012), Pitts (1990), Reid (1997), Reid & Langtimm (1993), Ruan et al. (2008), Tan (2016), Timm (1994), Timm & LaVal (2000), Timm, Lieberman et al. (2009), Timm, Wilson et al. (1989), Villalobos-Chaves et al. (2016).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicBat Biology and Ecology Studies→French-language works237,207→