MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6894021035 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6136104

Fritzolenellus

2014· article· en· W6894021035 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlabellaMerge (version control)Sagittal planeHolotypeDorsumRegular polygonPosterior segment of eyeball

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fritzolenellus sp. aff. hanseni (Poulsen, 1932) Fig. 3.1 Paedeumias hanseni Poulsen 1932. Olenellus hanseni Stein 2008, fig. 8B, 8C. Material examined. KUMIP 355562–355563. Discussion. This species shares the following characters with O. hanseni, which is known from the Ella Island Formation of North-East Greenland: the anterior cephalic margin is narrow (sag.) and developed as a raised ridge; an anterior glabellar furrow present; the anterolateral margins of the glabella deflect posteriorly at approximately at 40 degrees; LA length (sag.) equal to combined length (sag.) of LO, L1, and L2; the ocular lobe terminates posteriorly at SO; a prominent ocular furrow extends the length of the ocular lobe; the extraocular area is approximately the width (tr.) of the glabella at L2; S3 is strongly convex and conjoined adaxially; L2 and L3 merge abaxially; S2 is convex anteriorly and conjoined adaxially; L1 is straight and not conjoined adaxially; the lateral margins of LO and L1 are straight and parallel to a sagittal line; SO is slightly convex posteriorly, and not conjoined adaxially; posterior margin of LO convex posteriorly; the posterior border between LO and the intergenal angle is parallel to a transverse line; the intergenal angle is approximately 30-40 degrees; and the genal spines are relatively long (exsag.). Cowie & McNamara (1978) suggested O. hanseni was very similar to Fritzolenellus lapworthi (Peach and Horne, 1892), with the primary differences involving the length of the ocular lobes. Stein (2008) reiterated this suggestion, and also recognized the absence of a prominent parafrontal band and the presence of a plectrum when compared with F. lapworthi. These features are also observed in the specimens presented here. Due to the quality of preservation and the limited material, we are only tentatively assigning these specimens to F. hanseni. Occurrence. Olenellus zone or Waucoban Series, Dyeran stage, sensu Webster (2011a, b) and Webster et al. (2011), early Cambrian, Sekwi Formation, Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories, Canada, Section 4, 430– 435 m above the base of section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology→French-language works237,207→