Cimbrophlebia leahyi Archibald, 2009, n. sp.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cimbrophlebia leahyi, n. sp. (Figs. 2 A–C; 3A–C) Diagnosis. Wing distinguished from those of other Cimbrophlebia species by the following: 1), 2A morphology: six branches: two basal branches pectinate, minimum of four dichotomous distal branches separates it from C. bittaciformis [seven: three basal branches pectinate, four distal branches dichotomous], C. flabelliformis [four pectinate branches], not known to be distinct from C. brooksi, C. westae (2A is little known by preservation); 2), Shape: wide wing, length about four times width is similar to that of C. westae, C. flabelliformis, separates it from C. brooksi [distinctly narrower: length about five times width], C. bittaciformis [also slender (see C. flabelliformis remarks)]; 4), Colouration: distinct from that of C. flabelliformis, C. brooksi, C. westae, C. bittaciformis (see descriptions, C. flabelliformis remarks, Figs. 1 A; 2A, B; 4A, C; 6A, C; 7A). Description: holotype (sex undetermined). As in diagnosis, Figs. 2 A–C; 3A–C, and the following. Head: preserved characters as known in C. bittaciformis: long rostrum; large compound eyes; long antennae, ~ 14 mm preserved (incomplete). Thorax: poorly preserved. Legs: long, thin; tibial spurs, single, large tarsal claw preserved; dense, small hairs, some interspersed coarse, larger hairs detected on femur, tibia. Wing: length ~ 31 mm, width ~ 8 mm (likely, by preservation). Colouration (as preserved, see Fig. 2 A, B): wing mostly dark, but 2A region light, light spots as above, Fig 2 A–B. Membrane rugose, except possibly in apical portion. Sc, R1 as in C. flabelliformis. Rs with five branches. M with four branches; Cu1, Cu2, 1A: little known by preservation; 2A, long, branched as in diagnosis; 3A not detected. Crossveins detected: one r1-sc, three csc2, two rs-rs, one rs-m. Abdomen: partially, indistinctly preserved. Type material. Holotype: TRUIPR L-018 F-1160 (part) and TRUIPR L-018 F-1161 (counterpart). A rather complete specimen, in the collection of TRU. Labelled: Holotype Cimbrophlebia leahyi Archibald, 2009. Collected and donated to TRU by John Leahy, 2008. Locality and age. McAbee, British Columbia, Canada; unnamed formation of the Kamloops Group, Okanagan Highlands; Early Eocene. Etymology. The specific epithet is a patronym formed from the surname of the collector, John Leahy, recognizing his generosity by the loan of the holotype (and numerous other specimens) to the author and subsequent donation to the TRU collection. Remarks. The holotype is the most complete specimen of the family reported here, with body parts and all four wings attached. Preserved body parts conform to those reported for C. bittaciformis (Willmann, 1977) and Malmocimbrophlebia buergeri (Bechly & Schweigert, 2000), although preservation does not allow determination of whether the small hairs on the leg are arranged in rows as in C. bittaciformis (Willmann’s Fig. 6).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".