Bibliographic record
Abstract
Agromyza isolata Malloch (Figs. 2, 70–71) Material examined. VERMONT: Chittenden Co., South Burlington, Winooski Gorge, 29.vi.2014, em. 15.vii.2014, C.S. Eiseman, ex Populus balsamifera, #CSE1176, CNC384839–384841 (3♂); Williston, Mud Pond, 28.viii.2016, em. 18–19.ix.2016, C.S. Eiseman, ex Populus balsamifera, #CSE3000, CNC654500–654504 (2♂ 3♀). Hosts. Salicaceae: Populus balsamifera L., P. deltoides W. Bartram ex Marshall, P. × jackii Sarg., P. trichocarpa Torr. & A.Gray ex. Hook., Salix bebbiana Sarg. (leaf mines only), S. lucida Muhl. (Spencer 1969; Spencer & Steyskal 1986). Spencer (1969) caught an adult female on P. tremuloides. Leaf mine. (Figs. 70–71) “Large irregular blackish blotch, with several larvae normally feeding together” (Spencer 1969). In our first collection of this species, the mines were not distinguished in the field from those of Agromyza albitarsis (see Comments). In our second collection, six very small, brown, irregular mines were found near the center of a leaf blade (Fig. 70). These expanded to large, irregularly lobed, pale greenish-brown blotches that partially coalesced, none of them quite reaching the leaf margins when complete (Fig. 71). The frass was in scattered black grains and irregular particles. Puparium. (Fig. 2) Yellow to yellowish-brown, 1.9–2.0 mm by 0.9–1.1 mm; formed outside the mine. Distribution. USA: CA, CO, MN (leaf mines only), PA, *VT, WA; Canada: AB, ON, QC, SK. Comments. In 2014 we collected mines of this species on Populus balsamifera along with similar mines that yielded adults of Agromyza albitarsis. At the time of collection, the mines were all assumed to represent the same fly species, and those of A. isolata were not photographed. When the larvae had emerged, the differences in the puparia of the two species were obvious; those of A. albitarsis were substantially larger and were reddish-brown rather than yellow (Fig. 2). The leaf from which we reared A. isolata in 2016 also contained a single larva of what we believe was A. albitarsis, forming a large, greenish mine along the leaf margin. It formed a puparium that was substantially larger than those of A. isolata, but no adult emerged.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".