Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the mid of the 18th century, a catholic missionary that traveled to Ethiopia would claim to have found two books of philosophy that were written in Geez-Hateta Zer'a Yaekob (the treatise of Zer'a Yaekob) and Hateta Wolde Heywot (the treatise of Wolde Heywet). The former was supposed to have been written in the 1660's. He sent the books to a scholar in France who studied the books. The books were received with surprise and were also translated into several languages. Some of the scholars that studied the books would later doubt the authenticity of the books and the interest in them subsided until another scholar of philosophy of Canadian origin, Claude Sumner, rekindled the interest by publishing several scientific articles on the philosophy of Zer'a Yaekob.<br> The writer heard about the treatise of Zer'a Yaekob but didn't have the chance to study them until the writer got a copy of a book containing both Zer'a Yaekob's and Wolde Heywet's Hateta's back in 2012. The book was in Geez. The writer invested sometime into them then in spite of limited skill in Geez. The writer could translate Zer'a Yaekob's Hateta and release the translations for encouraging discussion on the treatise in 2013. Zer'a Yaekob's Hateta has also been translated into Amharic in 2014 by the well-known scholar, the late professor Getachew Haile. In this document, the writer presents a draft document containing the writer's Amharic translation of the full treatise of Zer'a Yaekob with some English excerpts from treatise of Zer'a Yaekob and of Wolde Heywet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.051 | 0.076 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".