Diploneis cocquytiana Jovanovska & Wilson & Hamilton & Stone 2023, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diploneis cocquytiana sp. nov. (LM Figs 419–433, SEM Figs 434–441) Valves are weakly asymmetric, linear-elliptic with parallel to weakly convex margins and round apices (Figs 419– 434). Valve length is 35.5–62 μm and width is 15–20 μm. The axial area is narrow, lanceolate, slightly expanding into a small to indistinguishable central area (Figs 420, 434, 435), 3–4.8 μm wide. Externally, the canal is broad, linear to lanceolate, slightly expanded in the middle of the valve with four rows of cribrate (ca. 10 poroids) areolae narrowing into one at the valve apices (Figs 420, 434, 435, 437). Internally, a thick non-porous slightly raised silica plate encloses the longitudinal canal (Fig. 439). Externally, the raphe is filiform, curved with simple deflected proximal ends; linear expanded lanceolate depressions hold the proximal ends (Figs 435, 437). The distal raphe ends are unilaterally bent to the same side and terminate on the valve face at the mantle (Figs 434, 436, 438). Internally, the raphe is curved with simple proximal and distal ends that are slightly elevated with a small helictoglossa, and positioned in a depression formed by the longitudinal canal (Figs 439–441). The striae are parallel at mid-valve becoming radiate towards the apices, 9–10(11) in 10 μm. Striae are uniseriate becoming biseriate towards the valve margins (white arrow in Fig. 438). The striae are composed of round to rectangular areolae covered externally with fine pored cribra (20–30 poroids), 15–20 in 10 μm. The inter-areolar thickenings have fin-like silica ridges serrated with ca. 5–8 notched edges. The areolae increase in size towards the valve margins (Figs 435, 438). Internally, the alveoli open via a single elongated opening covered with a thin silica layer (Figs 439, 440). Type:— REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA, Lake Tanganyika, Kalambo Falls Lodge, at 770 m elevation; mud, 18 m water depth, collected SCUBA diving, 8°37’25.6” S 31°11’59.7” E, H. Büscher, 1 st September 2018 (holotype designated here, circled specimen BM 108984! = Fig. 429, isotypes ANSP-GC17213!, CANA-129315!). Type material CANA-129315. Registration: http://phycobank.org/103700 Pictures of the isolated specimen:— LM micrograph on 1000× magnification (Fig. S2j). Sequence data:— Plastid gene rbc L sequence (GenBank accession: OQ 660288). Etymology:— The specific epithet ‘ cocquytiana ’ honors Dr. Christine Cocquyt, who has made many significant contributions to diatom research from materials collected from Lake Tanganyika. Ecology and distribution:— This species has been observed in Lake Tanganyika in the three sub-basins on the shores of Zambia and Tanzania (including the coast of Burundi; Cocquyt 1998, fig. 14: 4). The species is very abundant in the alkaline, moderately mineral-rich and very transparent lake, where it occurs on sandy and muddy substrates (sometimes with mollusk shells) between 5 and 36 m water depth. It can also be found in submerged rocks in the littoral areas at Jakobsen Beach or to a water depth of 3 m in Chituta Bay and free-living (i.e. tychoplanktonic) in plankton to a depth of 60 m in Mahale National Park, probably resulting from water currents and turbulence. Diploneis cocquytiana sp. nov. mostly coexists with D. fossa sp. nov., D. serrulata sp. nov., D. kilhamiana sp. nov., D. angusta sp. nov., D. cristata sp. nov., D. salzburgeri sp. nov., and D. tanganyikae sp. nov. in Kalambo Falls Lodge with well-established populations as well as in Mahale National Park, Cape Nangu at Kasaba Bay, Ndole Bay, Kiganza Bay, Chituta Bay, Mutondwe Island, and the Rukoma area (see Fig. 1c–f). Main differential characters:— Valve shape, canal width, striae pattern, external fin-like ornamentations across the valve, fins scattered over the canals, and poroids <30 per areola. Similar species:— Diploneis elongata sp. nov., Diploneis fontium Reichardt & Lange-Bertalot (2004: 433), and Diploneis mollenhaueri Lange-Bertalot & Fuhrmann (2020: 85).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".