Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment on behalf of Mrs. K. Patel concerning 7 Sudbury Hill Close Wembley London
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Border Archaeology Ltd (BA) has undertaken an Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment (ADBA) regarding the demolition of a modern chalet bungalow at No. 7 Sudbury Hill Close, Wembley, London HA0 2QR and erection of a three-storey residential building with associated car parking, soft and hard landscaping, cycle and waste storage. The overall archaeological potential of the site has been assessed in overall terms as Low to Moderate, with particular reference to encountering possible evidence of medieval occupation associated with the nearby hamlet of Sudbury and buried remains of outbuildings associated with Egremont Cottage and Aspen Lodge, two late 18th/early 19th century villas which were demolished in the mid-1950s. However, as the site of the new building will be located almost entirely within the footprint of the existing house, it is likely that any sub-surface features and deposits will already have been heavily disturbed by previous groundworks, thus reducing the likelihood of encountering significant archaeological remains. The overall archaeological potential of the site has been assessed in overall terms as Low to Moderate, with particular reference to encountering possible evidence of medieval occupation associated with the nearby hamlet of Sudbury and buried remains of outbuildings associated with Egremont Cottage and Aspen Lodge, two late 18th/early 19th century villas which were demolished in the mid-1950s. However, as the site of the new building will be located almost entirely within the footprint of the existing house, it is likely that any sub-surface features and deposits will already have been heavily disturbed by previous groundworks, thus reducing the likelihood of encountering significant archaeological remains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".