MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6894202522 · doi:10.5683/sp2/a95qio

Tabaret Hall - Integrated Project Dossier (Third Floor) (2016)

2020· dataset· en· W6894202522 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLecture hallTown hallFront (military)DowntownDome (geology)Center (category theory)Symbol (formal)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tabaret Hall is located in the heart of the University of Ottawa’s campus at 550 Cumberland Street. This location puts Tabaret Hall steps away from Ottawa’s downtown core and the Rideau Canal. Tabaret Hall is named after Father Joseph-Henri Tabaret under who’s leadership Bytown College became the University of Ottawa. Construction on the building started in 1904 at the same site as the original building, which was destroyed by fire in 1903. Tabaret Hall is a reinforced concrete building, likely due to concrete’s fire resistant properties and the fear of another fire. It is also one of the earliest examples of reinforced concrete buildings in Canada. The central section of the building was completed in 1905 and the wings were added in 1914 and 1922. The building was designed by A. O. Von Herbulis from New York who was inspired by the Washington capital building. This influence can be seen throughout the building and in particular, in the glass dome in the center that was finally completed in 1970. It can also be seen in the iconic façade with its six large ionic pillars and the triangular pediment and in the massing of the building. Tabaret Hall is central to the University of Ottawa and is so important to its image that it’s iconic front façade inspired the school's logo. The building has housed a variety of facilities since its construction such as a gymnasium, dining area, dormitories, classrooms and offices. Throughout its life, Tabaret Hall has inspired thousands of students and is a symbol of the institution. This is the Integrated Project Dossier compiled by a group of undergraduate students of the Architectural Conservation and Sustainability Program (Engineers and architects) at Carleton University for the CIVE3207 (ARCN4100) Historic Site Recording and Assessment course in 2016. The project focused on recording the third floor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3570.137

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→