La théorie de la transposition didactique : un outil conceptuel pour décrire les savoirs grammaticaux élaborés en classe par les élèves
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nos travaux 1 visent dcrire les connaissances grammaticales labores par des lves au cours de l'enseignement/apprentissage de l'accord du verbe.Cette description est ralise grce l'analyse des interactions didactiques, c'est--dire les interactions qu'entretiennent les trois ples du triangle didactique (lve, enseignant et savoir) dans la construction des objets enseigns.La thorie de la transposition didactique de Chevallard (1985/1991) constitue la pierre angulaire de nos travaux.Les concepts de transposition didactique externe (savoir enseigner) et interne (savoir effectivement enseign) agissent titre d'analyseur des interactions didactiques ; le doublet chronogense / topogense est l'outil conceptuel que nous convoquons pour dpeindre le passage des savoirs enseigner aux savoirs effectivement enseigns et appris.Cet article mettra l'accent sur les aspects conceptuels et mthodologiques associs l'tude des interactions didactiques en classe; des rsultats seront prsents dans le seul but d'illustrer notre dmarche de recherche qui s'inscrit dans le cadre de la thorie de la transposition didactique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".