MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6894234644 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7910797

Neazonia tripleta Szwedo 2007, sp. n.

2007· article· en· W6894234644 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRostrumVertex (graph theory)Apex (geometry)Sensory systemFibrous jointHypertelorism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neazonia tripleta sp. n. Figs 1–11, 24, 25 Etymology: Specific epithet refers to triplets of sensory pits on thoracic wing-pads and abdominal tergites. Diagnosis: More flattened dorso-ventrally than N. imprinta, not as elongate as N. immatura. Pronotum with group of three sensory pits at posterior angle (quadruplet and pentaplet near mid-line and another quadruplet at posterior angle present in N. imprinta). Anterior margin of pronotum distinctly incised (not incised in N. imprinta and N. immatura). Description: Total length of body 3.3 mm. General shape ovoid, strongly flattened, with tip of rostrum distinctly exceeding apex of abdomen. Head: Vertex subtriangular, a bit shorter (0.36 mm) than width at base (0.41 mm), anterior margin acutely rounded, lateral margins slightly elevated, posterior margin merely excavated posteriorly at mid-length of compound eyes, disc of vertex concave, divided by longitudinal mid-dorsal ecdysial line into left and right halves. Frons about 1.9 times as long as wide, 0.79 mm long along mid-line, 0.41 mm wide, angularly rounded at apex, broadening gradually to level of antennae, then narrowing, slightly concave at level of frontoclypeal suture. Lateral carinae originating anterior to compound eye, slightly elevated, extending to level of frontoclypeal suture; submedian carinae extending slightly below the level of bases of lateral carinae, converging medially to frontoclypeal suture and parallel to lateral carinae, disc of frons elevated in upper portion, above bases of lateral carinae, elevated between submedian carinae, concave between submedian and lateral carinae; quadruplet of sensory pits in upper portion slightly below level of bases of submedian carinae; second sensory triplet pair at level of lower margin of compound eye. Clypeus 1.00 mm long; postclypeus 0.21 mm long along mid-line, 0.46 mm long along lateral line; anteclypeus 0.70 mm long along mid-line; clypellus short, 0.09 mm long. Rostrum 3-segmented, longer than body; basal segment 0.18 mm long; subapical segment, 0.26 mm; apical segment, about 1.8 mm long (tip destroyed). Antenna 0.71 mm long; scape cylindrical, slightly shorter than pedicel; pedicel elongate subglobose, with a few sensory fields; first flagellomere globular, narrower than pedicel; arista elongate. Thorax: Thoracic nota divided by longitudinal mid-dorsal line into three pairs of plates. Pronotum distinctly wider than head including compound eyes, anteriorly produced almost to middle of compound eyes, with distinct anteromedian lobes, anterior angles slightly protruding anteriorly, lateral margins distinctly diverging posteriorly, posterior margin weakly sinuate, posterior angle with triplet of sensory pits. Pronotum along mid-line slightly shorter (0.30 mm) than vertex along mid-line, 1.26 mm wide at posterior angles. Mesonotum with wing pads wider (1.44 mm) than pronotum, distinctly longer (0.49 mm) than pronotum along mid-line, anterior margin arcuate anteriorly, lateral margins distinctly diverging posteriorly, posterior margin excavate, almost straight in median portion, lateral carinae present, elevated, delimiting disc of mesonotum, triplet of sensory pits present at posterior angle of wing pad, also single sensory pit visible on wing pad laterad of lateral carina. Metanotum with wing pads slightly wider (1.46 mm) than mesonotal wing pads, but shorter (0.36 mm) than mesonotum along mid-line, disc not delimited by carinae, wing pads extending to abdominal tergite 4, posterior margin excavate. Prothoracic and mesothoracic coxae elongate, slender and ridged. Prothoracic femur slightly longer (0.59 mm) than prothoracic tibia (0.50 mm); prothoracic tibia subquadrangular in cross section, with rows of setae; first tarsomere 0.1 mm long with rows of plantar setae; second tarsomere 0.21 mm long, with rows of plantar setae and long apical setae; claws relatively large, 0.33 mm long; arolium wide, spatulate. Mesothoracic leg with femur shorter than prothoracic femur (0.56 mm), shorter than mesothoracic tibia (0.67 mm); mesothoracic tibia subquadrangular in cross section, slightly flattened with rows of long setae; mesothoracic tarsus 0.40 mm long; first tarsomere 0.14 mm long with rows of plantar setae; second tarsomere 0.28 mm long; tarsal claws distinct; arolium spatulate. Metathoracic femur 0.71 mm long; metathoracic tibia 1.20 mm long, round in cross section, with apical row of four teeth, covered with long setae; first tarsomere long. Abdomen: 9-segmented, narrower than metathorax including wing pads, arcuately converging posteriorly, 1.82 mm long. Abdominal tergites IV to VIII with triplets of sensory pits on each side at posterior angles, delicately carinate at 1/3 laterad.Abdominal pleurites IV–VIII narrow with stigmal area in anterior portion. All abdominal sternites without median fissure. Pygofer (segment IX) triangular, 0.50 mm long along mid-line, 0.52 mm wide at base, with distinct narrow median incision ventrally, lateral lobes of pygofer with triplets of sensory pits near tip, posterior margins of pygofer lobes excavate, anal “combs” lobe-like. Holotype: Nymph of IIIrd instar, specimen no. 1236 embedded in Canada balsam, Dany Azar coll. (Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris). LEBANON: Central Lebanon, Hammana/Mdeyrij outcrop; Lower Cretaceous, Uppermost Neocomian?–Lowermost Aptian (Azar et al. 2003).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationFrench-language works237,207