The Strathcona Building (Ground Floor) - integrated Project Dossier 2014
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Strathcona Building is a five-storey apartment building constructed in 1927 using state-of-the-art materials and technologies. The building is located in the Sandy Hill region which, at the time, was one of the more affluent regions within Ottawa. Lord Strathcona is a prominent historical figure in the community, where there is also a neighbouring park bearing his name. The Strathcona is recognized by the Ontario Heritage Act. The plaque was mounted on the building but has since gone missing. The Strathcona Building’s heritage value derives from its Neo-Classical and Art Nouveau architectural styles, and its association with important leaders in Canadian history. The Strathcona was built in 1927 and was named after Lord Strathcona, a popular politician and businessman from the days after Confederation. The building was the largest apartment building in Ottawa at the time of construction. With innovative technologies and design features, including a refrigeration system, fireproofing terra cotta wall construction and a roof garden. The Strathcona is representative of the transition to apartment dwelling in Canada, where it held the largest number of dwellings under one roof in Ottawa. The Strathcona Apartments have housed some important leaders in Canadian history including former Prime Minister John Diefenbaker and former New Democratic Party Leader Tommy Douglas. The scope of this dossier was to create a record of the ground floor and document the heritage qualities of the Strathcona. This is the Integrated Project Dossier compiled by a group of undergraduate students of the Architectural Conservation and Sustainability Program (Engineers and architects) at Carleton University for the CIVE3207 (ARCN4100) Historic Site Recording and Assessment course in 2014.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.090 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".