MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 16712: Focal Adhesion Kinase: A Putative Therapeutic Target for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

2011· article· en· W68976074 on OpenAlexaff
Roxane Paulin, Jolyane Meloche, Audrey Courboulin, Caroline Lambert, Evangelos D. Michelakis, Sébastien Bonnet

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaMeloche (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePulmonary hypertensionCardiologyFocal adhesionInternal medicinePharmacologySignal transductionCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by enhanced pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells (PASMC) proliferation, migration and suppressed apoptosis. This phenotype is attributed in part to the sustained activation of the neoplasic axis c-Src/STAT3. In cancer, c-Src enhances focal adhesion kinase activation (FAK), a signaling hub implicated in the sustainability of cell proliferation, survival and motility, in part by potently inducing STAT family of proteins activation. Recently FAK inhibition has been proposed as a new therapeutic intervention in cancer. We hypothesized that FAK inhibition in PAH will decrease the activation of STAT3 axis decreasing PASMC proliferation, migration and resistance to apoptosis. Methods/Results: Using immunoblots (n=3 p<0.05) we showed activation of both c-Src and FAK (phosphorylation on Y416 and Y397 respectively) in human PAH-PASMCs resulting in cSrc/FAK complex formation (FAK phosphorylation on Y576) promoting STAT3 activation (phosphorylation on Y705). All these results were inhibited by 1) Src inhibitor PP2, 2) FAK siRNA. The Src/FAK-dependent activation of STAT3 accounts for 1) PAH-PASMCs mitochondrial hyperpolarization (TMRM n=150 p<0.05), increasing resistance to apoptosis (n=150 p<0.05 TUNEL) 2) increases proliferation by 30% (PCNA & Ki67) 3) increases cell migration (transwell assay, n=3 p<0.05) and invasion (Scratch test n=5 p<0.05) by 25% compared to controls. All these findings were similarly reversed by either Src, FAK and STAT3 inhibitors. Finally, in vivo FAK-siRNA nebulization improves monocrotaline-PAH (n=10 in each group p<0.05) measured by PA pressure, PA wall thickness, right ventricular hypertrophy (Echo & catheterization). Conclusion: FAK inhibition represents a new therapeutic target for PAH. Currently new FAK inhibitors have been moved to clinic trials to treat cancer. Our findings suggest that these compounds could be useful for the treatment of PAH as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→