MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6899025911 · doi:10.58088/vsc3-cb48

Berm migration and munitions motion under scaled storm events

2023· dissertation· en· W6899025911 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Delaware · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCoastal and Marine Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBermStormCoastal erosionBreakwaterErosionWave heightForcing (mathematics)Coastal engineeringNatural (archaeology)Coastal hazards

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From the time of the First World War until 1970, unused munitions used to be disposed into the sea. A century later, these unused munitions are still becoming exposed onshore endangering the public and marine life. The migration and exposure of these unused munitions in the nearshore under extreme events is poorly understood. In the United States, coastal regions are home to about 128 million people or nearly 40% of the whole population. Coastal erosion will continue to worsen as storms intensify due to sea level rise driven by climate change. As a result of the erosion of natural beach defenses, infrastructure and populations close to coastal areas will endure flooding. It’s crucial to predict the migration of geomorphological features such as berms in order to understand the erosion processes. The goal of this study is to take an initial look at how to bring these two topics, berms and munitions, together by studying the processes that drive munitions of variable density to migrate and bury in the berm. A large-scale experiment at Institut national de la recherche scientifique (INRS) in Quebec City, Canada was conducted to study these processes. Mantoloking Beach, NJ and Hurricane Sandy were scaled to replicate the beach profile and wave conditions, respectively. One hundred fifty-five munitions of variable density were deployed for this experiment. Three cases from the experiment were analyzed for this study: a low-forcing case, a high-forcing case, and a longer-period wave case. In addition to the forcing conditions established during each case, the root mean square wave height was calculated to understand the hydrodynamics for each of the 3 cases. The force going into the swash zone was compared to the accretion and erosion found in the berm. The greater the force going in, the greater the accretion or erosion found in the berm. Less dense munitions had greater net migrations than their denser counterparts. Munitions deployed on the berm crest migrated onshore while the munitions starting on the berm face migrated offshore.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of DelawareSame topicCoastal and Marine DynamicsFrench-language works237,207