Interview with Lieutenant Colonel Colin Magee (March 22, 2022)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interviewer: Ruky Osubele Interviewee: Lieutenant Colonel Colin Magee Rank: Lieutentant Colonel Medals and Honours: CD 3; ISAF; Special Service Medal – NATO, Peacekeeping Medal; Somalia Medal; US meritorious service medal An interview/narrative of Colin Magee's experiences serving in the Canadian Armed Forces. Interview took place on March 22, 2022 over a video call. ABSTRACT: 0:00 – 0:33 – Introductions 0:34 – 1:20 – Born in Ireland, growing up and schooling in Toronto and joined the Army. 1:21 – 8:51 – Joining the Armed Forces, Reserves, training, career and places served in. 9:11 – 13:46 – Cyprus, Experience leading a rifle company in Nicosia maintaining the UN buffer zone. 13:48 – 25:22 – Afghanistan, working with political advisors in ISAF headquarters in Kabul. 25:25 – 29:05 – Classifying Cyprus and Afghanistan as peacekeeping, peacemaking and counter-insurgency. Differences between peacekeeping and counter-insurgency, state building. 29:06 – 33:52 – Differences between peacekeeping, military peace and counter-insurgency. Intervention with or without consent. 33:53 – 38:44– Rules of engagement in peacekeeping vs counterinsurgency, tenents, equipment armed with (Cyprus vs Afghanistan). 38:47 – 44:44 – Conflicts situations for peacekeeping vs counter-insurgency missions. 44:45 – 53:18 – Peacekeeping and counter-insurgency as effective strategies in preventing conflict, factors that prevent peacekeeping and counter-insurgency missions from being effective. 53:19 – 57:23 – Peacekeeping and Canadian identity 57:23 – 58:54 – Peacekeeping tactics changing through his military career. 58:55 – 1:02:44 – Closing remarks
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.086 | 0.021 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".