Construction and consideration of integrated standard system for integrity management of oil and gas storage and transportation assets
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The construction of standard system by Chinese enterprises is characterized by the repeated and crossing contents, as well as multiple reference levels, of the single technical standards and the standards formulated by the standards committees of various disciplines. Thus, it is prone to causing the problems such as poor connection of standard content, great difference in requirements of implementation, and uneven development in the long-term application. In order to implement the National standardization development program and the strategic deployment of the PipeChina, the construction of PipeChina-featured integrated standard system for integrity management of oil and gas storage and transportation assets was practiced through combing the relevant laws and regulations, the national and the industry standards on integrity management of assets, with reference to the relevant Canadian national standards and the best practice results of the well-known foreign energy companies in the internal construction of integrated standards. Specifically, the integrated standard framework for integrity management of assets was built, and the preparation principles of integrated standards were established, including the unified object recognition, technical requirements and business management. The swim-lane flow chart for quality control of integrated standards was created. In addition, the integrated standards covering the integrity management of assets were formulated, including the general specifications for integrity management of assets, and the codes for integrity management of oil and gas pipelines. In this way, the problems of coordination, applicability and advancement of standards were effectively solved. In general, the research results could provide powerful guarantee for the realization of digital guidance of asset integrity management business objects and the operational activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it