MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6901593332 · doi:10.6068/dp15d421e1dba17

TREND: Xignite. FactSet Corporate Fundamentals: Number of Employees | Stock Symbol: GME | Symbol Name: GameStop Corp New, 01/31/2012 - 01/31/2017. Data-Planet™ Statistical Datasets by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 016-005-118

2017· other· en· W6901593332 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueData Planet · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStock (firearms)EarningsCONQUESTStock marketStock exchangeContext (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Xignite. FactSet Corporate Fundamentals: Number of Employees | Stock Symbol: GME | Symbol Name: GameStop Corp New, 01/31/2012 - 01/31/2017. Data-Planet™ Statistical Datasets by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 016-005-118 Dataset: Represents the number of both full- and part-time employees of the company. This database provides stock fundamentals data for active United States and Canadian listed companies. Companies are identified by symbol and name. Equities, common stock, and some ETFs and preferred stocks are covered. Exchanges include BATS, NASDAQ, NYSE ARCA, NYSE Market Equities, and limited OTCBB and TSX Venture coverage (liquid companies only). Data points include earnings and dividends, ratios and sales, and stock price. Note that not all metrics are available for all stocks. http://www.xignite.com/product/company-fundamentals Category: Industry, Business, and Commerce, Labor and Employment Subject: Corporations, Part-Time Workers, Full-Time Workers, Publicly Traded Companies Source: Xignite Xignite provides on-demand financial market data covering global equities, commodities, currencies, options, fixed income, mutual funds, derivatives, and OTC (“over-the-counter” or those traded in a context other than a formal exchange) instruments. http://www.xignite.com/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0970.191

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData PlanetFrench-language works237,207