MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Supplementary Data for "Declines in anthropogenic mercury emissions in the Global North and China offset by the Global South"

2025· dataset· en· W6902091843 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatitudeLongitudeGeographic coordinate systemNetCDFChinaPopulationMercury (programming language)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<b>Supplementary Data 1:</b> Country technical groupings for determining emission factors of Hg. WEurope - Western Europe. ECEurope - Eastern and Central Europe. U.S.&amp;CA - United States and Canada. RON - the rest of the Global North. SSA - Sub-Saharan Africa. NAME - Northern Africa and the Middle East. LATIN - Latin America. ROS - the rest of the Global South.<b>Supplementary Data 2:</b> The parameters of the abatement factor of sigmoid curves. PP - power plant combustion. IND - industry combustion. DR - commercial/residential/ transportation/agriculture combustion.<b>Supplementary Data 3:</b> Base year ASM population and data qualities by countries. ASM - artisanal and small-scale mining. ASGM - artisanal and small-scale gold mining.<b>Supplementary Data 4:</b> Gridded global Hg emission data for 1960 and 2021 (0.1°×0.1°). The NetCDF file Supplementary_Data_4.nc contains gridded data representing global Hg emissions for the years 1960 and 2021. It includes dimensions for latitude (1800 points, 90°N to 90°S), longitude (3600 points, 180°W to 180°E) and year (2 points, 1960 and 2021). The variables are latitude (values in degrees north), longitude (values in degrees east), year (1960 and 2021), and emissions (Hg emissions data in units of Mg per grid cell).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareFrench-language works237,207