MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Supplementary Data for "Declines in anthropogenic mercury emissions in the Global North and China offset by the Global South"

2025· dataset· en· W6902091843 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatitudeLongitudeGeographic coordinate systemNetCDFChinaPopulationMercury (programming language)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supplementary Data 1: Country technical groupings for determining emission factors of Hg. WEurope - Western Europe. ECEurope - Eastern and Central Europe. U.S.&CA - United States and Canada. RON - the rest of the Global North. SSA - Sub-Saharan Africa. NAME - Northern Africa and the Middle East. LATIN - Latin America. ROS - the rest of the Global South.Supplementary Data 2: The parameters of the abatement factor of sigmoid curves. PP - power plant combustion. IND - industry combustion. DR - commercial/residential/ transportation/agriculture combustion.Supplementary Data 3: Base year ASM population and data qualities by countries. ASM - artisanal and small-scale mining. ASGM - artisanal and small-scale gold mining.Supplementary Data 4: Gridded global Hg emission data for 1960 and 2021 (0.1°×0.1°). The NetCDF file Supplementary_Data_4.nc contains gridded data representing global Hg emissions for the years 1960 and 2021. It includes dimensions for latitude (1800 points, 90°N to 90°S), longitude (3600 points, 180°W to 180°E) and year (2 points, 1960 and 2021). The variables are latitude (values in degrees north), longitude (values in degrees east), year (1960 and 2021), and emissions (Hg emissions data in units of Mg per grid cell).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.015
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7630.306

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareFrench-language works237,207